- legal-analyst: opus 4.6 → opus 4.7
- legal-proofreader: opus 4.6 → opus 4.7
- legal-writer: sonnet 4.6 → opus 4.7 (complex block writing benefits from stronger model)
- block_writer MODEL_MAP: updated opus ID to 4.7
Opus 4.7 brings: high-res images (2576px), better file-based memory,
improved DOCX generation, and task budgets for agentic loops.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
New issues created by the CEO via curl were missing plugin_state records,
causing them to be invisible in the legal-ai UI. Added iron rule: after every
POST to create an issue, INSERT into plugin_state with the case number.
Also fixed 8070-25 CMPA issues directly in DB (3 records added).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
- CEO agent now sends email via notify.py when awaiting human response
- CEO creates child issues (parentId) instead of flat disconnected issues
- Fix notify.py email address to chaim+paperclip@marcus-law.co.il
- Move Paperclip UI assets (RTL CSS + Hebrew JS) into repo under scripts/
- Add deploy.sh script to push assets to live Paperclip instance
- Fix comment box positioning: newest comment on top, input below it
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The CEO was ignoring the focused wake reason and doing a full heartbeat
scan of all cases/issues before getting to the actual comment. Added
step 0: check $PAPERCLIP_WAKE_REASON first — if user_commented, skip
directly to comment handling. Don't scan other cases.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
CEO was missing get_chair_directions, record_chair_feedback,
list_chair_feedback, and search_case_documents. Without these tools
it couldn't read or update chair directions when processing draft
annotations.
Now the CEO will:
1. Read existing chair_directions via MCP tool
2. Record each draft annotation as chair_feedback
3. Update analysis-and-research.md
4. Post summary for user review before routing to writer
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
When the user writes editing instructions inside a draft DOCX, the CEO
must not just forward them as a checklist. Instead:
1. Read analysis-and-research.md + existing chair_directions
2. Translate draft annotations into methodological structure (syllogism)
3. Update chair_directions with the new analysis
4. Post summary to user and WAIT for approval
5. Only after approval → create issue for writer
This gives the user a chance to verify the CEO understood correctly
before the writer starts working.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Even when the user asks to edit specific paragraphs in an existing
draft, the CEO must first analyze through the methodology: identify
which legal issue the edit serves, build syllogistic structure,
reference specific source documents, and state the review standard.
Without this, the writer gets a technical checklist instead of
methodological guidance.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Agent JWT cannot wake other agents directly (returns "Agent can only
invoke itself"). The correct pattern: create an issue + assign to the
target agent → Paperclip triggers wakeup automatically.
Also documented all correct API routes in HEARTBEAT.md:
- POST /api/issues/{id}/comments (not /issues/)
- POST /api/companies/{company-id}/issues (not /api/issues)
- PATCH /api/issues/{id}
- POST /api/agents/{id}/wakeup (self only, with payload.issueId)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The CEO was sending empty issues like "הועבר לכתיבה" without any
methodological content. The writer needs: syllogistic structure per
issue, source document references, claim handling table, chair
directions, style guidelines, and draft file path when available.
Added "תבנית issue לכותב ההחלטה" with all 5 required sections.
Updated comment routing to read drafts word-by-word and use the template.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The agents used /api/agents/{id}/wake (404) with a fallback of INSERT
INTO agent_wakeup_requests. The DB insert creates only the wakeup
record without a heartbeat_run, so the Paperclip dispatcher never
processes it — agents get stuck in queued forever.
Fix:
- All agents: /wake → /wakeup (correct Paperclip API endpoint)
- Remove all DB INSERT fallbacks, replace with warning
- Document the rule in CLAUDE.md: always API, never DB insert
- Save to memory for future conversations
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
When a user comments on a Paperclip issue, the built-in automation wakes
the assigned agent directly, bypassing the CEO. This meant user instructions
(like "read the uploaded draft and route to the right agent") were ignored.
Changes:
- Plugin: add issue.comment.created event handler that wakes the CEO agent
with the comment context (plugin-legal-ai, separate repo)
- HEARTBEAT: add steps 2b (read recent user comments) and 2c (check
attachments) before agents start working
- CEO agent: add comment-routing section — read, check attachments, route
- Writer agent: add step 0 — check for uploaded DOCX drafts before writing
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Install git in Docker image and wrap all subprocess git calls in
try/except so a missing or failing git binary never kills an upload
that already succeeded.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
After Dafna fills her positions in the analysis document, the analyst
now runs a second pass to: verify cited case law against corpus and
case documents, deepen factual findings based on the chosen direction,
close open questions, and strengthen CREAC preparation.
Pipeline flow updated: direction_approved → analyst pass 2 →
analysis_enriched → CEO creates writer issue → ready_for_writing.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The status map was using informal descriptions ("מסמכים הוגהו")
instead of actual DB values. Now each row shows:
- The exact status string in cases.status
- Which agent sets it
- What the CEO should do next
New statuses added: proofread, analyst_verified, research_complete,
qa_passed, qa_failed, exported. Removed ambiguous conditions.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Every agent now has explicit instructions in its own definition file,
not just in HEARTBEAT.md. An agent following only its own step-by-step
instructions will do the right thing on any new case.
All 6 non-CEO agents: explicit wakeup CEO block in completion step
(curl API + psql fallback, with agent name customized)
legal-ceo.md: issue template for analyst with 5 mandatory items
(document mapping table, no-extract list, split large docs,
wakeup CEO, blocked if failed)
legal-writer.md: explicit Read of decision-methodology.md as step 1
(before case_get, not just "read before starting")
legal-qa.md: methodology_compliance severity → critical
(was warning — decisions without syllogisms/steel-man now blocked)
legal-proofreader.md: added case_update tool + status='proofread'
(was missing entirely — CEO couldn't know proofreading was done)
legal-researcher.md: added case_update + mail notification
(was missing — CEO couldn't know research was done)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Documents >15K chars must be split by chapter/section and extracted
in parts. If extract_claims times out, retry with chunks or extract
manually. This prevents the Matmon document issue (108K chars, 4x timeout).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Test run on case 1130-25 revealed critical gaps. This commit fixes:
HEARTBEAT.md (#1, #11):
- Agents MUST wake CEO after completing any task (wakeup request)
- New "blocked" status option — agents cannot mark "done" if something failed
- Fallback: direct DB insert if API wake doesn't work
legal-analyst.md (#2):
- New step 6: completeness checks BEFORE finishing
- Verify all appeal/response documents extracted successfully
- Verify all extracted documents produced claims
- Verify classification is correct (no claims from committee)
- If any check fails → status = "blocked", not "done"
legal-ceo.md (#3, #6, #7, #12, #13, #14, #15):
- Step A rewritten with 3 sub-checks:
A1: extraction completeness (no missing documents)
A2: negative checks (wrong classification, abnormal counts, missing parties)
A3: methodology compliance (syllogisms, CREAC prep, steel-man, etc.)
- Any failure blocks progress to step B
legal-qa.md (#6 reinforcement):
- New step 2b: negative checks on the written decision
- Missing issues, bare quotes, empty formulas, mixed findings/conclusions
Also:
- Synced all agent files to /home/chaim/legal-ai/ (Paperclip reads from there)
- Synced methodology + lessons + corpus docs
- Fixed claim classification in DB: 20 committee/applicant claims → response (#5)
Remaining gaps (3):
- #4: Paperclip cache may need restart to pick up new definitions
- #7: Matmon document retry (25K words, 0 claims extracted)
- #9: 53 appellant claims may need synthesis (high but not blocking)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
"בית ספר להחלטות" Phase 2 — the system now has formal analytical
methodology for building quasi-judicial decisions, separate from
Dafna's writing style (SKILL.md) and content checklists.
What was done:
- Downloaded 5 authoritative sources (~341K words): FJC Judicial
Writing Manual (1991+2020), Garner Legal Writing in Plain English,
Posner How Judges Think, Scalia/Garner Making Your Case
- Extracted principles from all sources into intermediate docs
- Synthesized into docs/decision-methodology.md (3,400 words,
12 sections, 10 guiding principles)
- Integrated methodology into block-yod prompt via {methodology_guidance}
- Restructured legal-writer agent workflow to follow analytical stages
- Made "answer all claims" flexible (bundle/skip via chair_directions)
- Added methodology compliance check (#7) to legal-qa agent
- Updated all knowledge files (CLAUDE.md, SKILL.md, lessons, corpus)
Three-layer architecture:
1. Methodology (decision-methodology.md) — universal, how to think
2. Content checklists (lessons.py) — specific per appeal subtype
3. Style (SKILL.md) — Dafna's personal writing patterns
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Closes the loop so דפנה's positions (written inline in the UI and
saved to analysis-and-research.md) automatically become binding
direction for the legal-writer agent — no manual copy-paste,
no bypass.
Backend:
- research_md.extract_chair_directions(path) returns a compact dict
with status (missing/empty/partial/complete), filled_count,
empty_count, and a reduced list of threshold_claims + issues each
with {id, number, title, direction}. Designed to be directly usable
as direction_doc by the writer.
- New MCP tool: drafting.get_chair_directions(case_number) wraps the
helper, resolves the case research file path via config.find_case_dir,
returns formatted JSON.
- Registered in server.py as mcp__legal-ai__get_chair_directions.
legal-writer agent update:
- Adds get_chair_directions to the tools list.
- New mandatory "שלב 1ב" before any block writing: call
get_chair_directions, branch on status.
- missing → halt, report "legal-analyst לא רץ עדיין"
- empty → halt, instruct Dafna to fill positions via the UI URL
- partial → halt unless user confirms; write only filled sections
- complete → proceed
- New "שלב 1ג" constructs an internal direction_doc from the
received chair rulings before writing block י.
- Block י section expanded with 5 binding rules:
1. Open each discussion with Dafna's ruling as the thesis
2. Frame the reasoning in her style (use get_style_guide phrases)
3. Match her tone (decisive vs nuanced)
4. Must NOT contradict her position — if she disagreed with your
own inclination, her position rules
5. Use legal_questions from the analysis file as the analytical
structure (principle question first, concrete application second)
- New bullet section for block יא: summarize each chair ruling
briefly, state final outcome, close with the signed date formula.
Verified all four status paths (missing/empty/partial/complete) via
local test. Now Dafna's workflow is fully end-to-end: she reads the
analyst report in the UI, fills "עמדת ועדת הערר" in each card, hits
blur to auto-save, then triggers legal-writer — which picks up her
positions as direction without any file shuffle.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Add "עמדת ועדת הערר" placeholder to legal-analyst agent template
for each legal issue, to be filled by the chair as guidance for the
writing agent
- Fix green checkmark not showing for proofread documents (treat
'proofread' status same as 'completed')
- Show time alongside date in local files listing
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Add delete_document_chunks for reprocessing, save extracted text to disk
- Expand case directory structure (original/extracted/proofread/backup)
- Update classifier patterns (תגובה, הודעת עמדה)
- Fix proofreader agent paths for new directory layout
- Update HEARTBEAT to notify on every task completion
- Improve bidi_table with LRE/PDF directional embedding
- Add Paperclip project verification and auto-close setup issue
- Add auto-sync-cases.sh for Gitea synchronization
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Remove cases/new|in-progress|completed subdivision (status managed in DB)
- Rename documents/original → documents/originals (consistent plural)
- Move exports from global data/exports/ into cases/{num}/exports/
- Add documents/research/ for case law and analysis files
- Update all agents, scripts, config, web API endpoints, and DB paths
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
New: scripts/notify.py — sends via SMTP (notify@marcus-law.co.il → paperclip+chaim@marcus-law.co.il)
Updated: HEARTBEAT.md — agents must send email when waiting for human decision
Triggers: outcome choice, direction approval, QA failures, review ready.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
All agent output — comments, status, errors, summaries, thinking — must be in Hebrew.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Two issues that caused QA agent to fail:
1. save_block_content saved to DB only — now also rebuilds drafts/decision.md
2. legal-writer.md now has explicit mandatory step: case_update(status="drafted")
Without these, workflow_status reports has_draft=false and QA can't run.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
brainstorm_directions tool uses claude -p subprocess which times out
when called from inside a claude session (agent). CEO should think
about directions directly — it already has all the context.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
CEO now follows a step-by-step interactive flow:
A. Check status and what's been done
B. Summarize case + ask Chaim for outcome (1/2/3)
C. Read response, run brainstorm, present directions
D. Read direction choice, approve, launch writer agent
E. Monitor writing progress
F. QA and export
All interaction happens through Paperclip comments.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Manages the decision writing pipeline:
- Creates issues and assigns to specialist agents
- Tracks status across all active cases
- Reports to human (Chaim) when approvals needed
- Never writes or analyzes directly — delegates
All 4 specialist agents now report to CEO.
Hierarchy: עוזר משפטי → מנתח/חוקר/כותב/בודק
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Symlinked to Paperclip instructions directory for each agent.
Single source of truth: .claude/agents/ files → symlinked to Paperclip.
Cleaned duplicate soul_md from DB metadata.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Complete agent pipeline for decision writing:
1. legal-analyst (existing) — extract claims/responses/replies
2. legal-researcher (new) — analyze precedents, plans, protocols
3. legal-writer (new) — write decision blocks in Dafna's style
4. legal-qa (new) — validate before export (6 checks)
All agents use claude_local adapter (Claude Code session, zero API cost).
Each has YAML frontmatter with specific tools and detailed Hebrew instructions.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Defines the agent's role, tools, document type rules, and workflow.
Linked to Paperclip agent via --agent legal-analyst extraArg.
Key rules:
- Claims only from appeal docs, responses from response docs, replies from supplementary
- Never extract from precedents, plans, or protocols
- Must report results to Paperclip before finishing
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Ezer Mishpati - AI legal decision drafting system with:
- MCP server (FastMCP) with document processing pipeline
- Web upload interface (FastAPI) for file upload and classification
- pgvector-based semantic search
- Hebrew legal document chunking and embedding
