Chaim c9d83431e0
All checks were successful
G12 Leak-Guard / leak-guard (pull_request) Successful in 4s
Lint — undefined names / undefined-names (pull_request) Successful in 10s
fix(arguments): validate claim_ids + per-row savepoint in argument_aggregator
aggregate_claims_to_arguments crashed with "current transaction is aborted,
commands ignored until end of transaction block" on large cases (confirmed on
1027-04-26, 195 claims; reported via CMP-186).

Root cause: the proposition INSERT (legal_argument_propositions) was wrapped in
a broad except Exception with no savepoint. When the LLM echoes a
syntactically-valid-but-nonexistent claim_id, the FK violation
(legal_argument_propositions_claim_id_fkey) puts the asyncpg transaction into
aborted state. The except caught only that INSERT's error but never issued
ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, so the next statement (the following argument's INSERT
into legal_arguments) raised InFailedSQLTransactionError uncaught and crashed
the whole call. With many claims the bad-UUID probability is high -> consistent
failure.

Fix:
- Validate each claim_id against the known set of claim ids fetched for the
  case before INSERT, so a hallucinated id never reaches the DB (G1: fix at
  source). Malformed UUIDs are already dropped in _normalize_argument; this
  catches the valid-but-nonexistent ones.
- Wrap the INSERT in a per-row savepoint (async with conn.transaction()) as
  defense-in-depth, so any unexpected constraint failure rolls back to the
  savepoint instead of poisoning the surrounding transaction.

Invariants: G1 (normalize at source, not symptom-catch on read). No parallel
path (G2). No silent swallow — skips are logged.

TaskMaster: legal-ai #156

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-24 12:58:03 +00:00
Description
AI Legal Decision Drafting System — MCP server, web upload, RAG search
37 MiB
Languages
Python 65.8%
TypeScript 32.2%
JavaScript 1%
Shell 0.7%
CSS 0.2%