b1ad67dc4922b6d3c5db503641ada7e7e39ccc82
Test run on case 1130-25 revealed critical gaps. This commit fixes: HEARTBEAT.md (#1, #11): - Agents MUST wake CEO after completing any task (wakeup request) - New "blocked" status option — agents cannot mark "done" if something failed - Fallback: direct DB insert if API wake doesn't work legal-analyst.md (#2): - New step 6: completeness checks BEFORE finishing - Verify all appeal/response documents extracted successfully - Verify all extracted documents produced claims - Verify classification is correct (no claims from committee) - If any check fails → status = "blocked", not "done" legal-ceo.md (#3, #6, #7, #12, #13, #14, #15): - Step A rewritten with 3 sub-checks: A1: extraction completeness (no missing documents) A2: negative checks (wrong classification, abnormal counts, missing parties) A3: methodology compliance (syllogisms, CREAC prep, steel-man, etc.) - Any failure blocks progress to step B legal-qa.md (#6 reinforcement): - New step 2b: negative checks on the written decision - Missing issues, bare quotes, empty formulas, mixed findings/conclusions Also: - Synced all agent files to /home/chaim/legal-ai/ (Paperclip reads from there) - Synced methodology + lessons + corpus docs - Fixed claim classification in DB: 20 committee/applicant claims → response (#5) Remaining gaps (3): - #4: Paperclip cache may need restart to pick up new definitions - #7: Matmon document retry (25K words, 0 claims extracted) - #9: 53 appellant claims may need synthesis (high but not blocking) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Description
AI Legal Decision Drafting System — MCP server, web upload, RAG search
Languages
Python
59.1%
TypeScript
37.4%
JavaScript
1.7%
Shell
1.2%
CSS
0.5%
Other
0.1%