Chaim
70f93c3bd4
A digest pointing at a ruling we don't hold yet ("unlinked") was captured globally
(missing_precedents inbox) but never surfaced IN THE CONTEXT of the case being
decided — so a relevant ruling known only via a digest could fall through the cracks
at the moment it matters. Adds the case-contextual radar:
- db.search_digests_semantic: new `linked_only` filter (False = unlinked-only target set).
- digest_library.case_digest_radar(case_number): builds the case topic from title +
appeal_subtype + the analyst's claims, embeds once, matches against UNLINKED digests,
and returns leads enriched with the underlying ruling's gap status + suggested action
(new_lead / gap_open / fetched / available_link).
- MCP tool `digest_radar` + endpoint GET /api/cases/{n}/digest-radar (for the agent and
the future case-page lead).
INV-DIG1 preserved: radar only — every lead points at the underlying RULING (fetch /
upload / link), never cites the digest. Read-only.
Validated on 8124-09-24 (היטל השבחה): 5 on-topic unlinked digests, scores 0.64–0.72.
The visible case-page panel is a separate UI change → goes through the design gate.
Invariants: G2 (reuses the one digest semantic-search + gap/citation resolvers),
INV-DIG1 (no digest citation), INV-DIG3 (gap surfacing). No schema change.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>