The gold-set's human role tags were made while seeing a claude AI recommendation,
so human↔AI agreement (~100%) is anchoring, not an independent accuracy signal.
This adds a third, genuinely independent judge — a DIFFERENT model (DeepSeek,
direct OpenAI-compatible API) classifies rule_role BLIND (never sees the human
tag nor the first AI's answer) — and reports an inter-rater agreement matrix.
Finding (100 tagged items): ai↔human 100% (anchored) vs deepseek↔human 50%
fine-grained — BUT 92% on the coarse axis (generalizable-rule vs application/
obiter). Conclusion: the fine sub-type (holding/interpretive/procedural) is an
inherently fuzzy boundary two capable models split differently; the coarse
"is this a real rule" axis is robust across models. Use the coarse axis as
ground truth; treat the sub-type as advisory, never as a gate.
Zero chair tagging, read-only on the gold-set. Key from ~/.hermes deepseek env.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
