extract_and_store read the WHOLE full_text, so a ruling a party cited in its
own arguments (block ז / appellant_claims / parties_claims) was recorded as the
deciding committee citing it — and surfaced as "צוטט ע״י דפנה". Example: ערר
130/10 appears only in the appellant_claims chunk of decision 1200-12-25, yet
was attributed to the chair.
Fix: build the extraction text from the discussion/ruling chunks via the
halacha extractor's _select_extractable_chunks (G2 — one definition of
"reasoning sections": legal_analysis/ruling/conclusion + discussion-anchor,
excluding facts/claims/intro). Falls back to full_text only for un-chunked rows.
A citation now reflects the deciding body's reliance, not a party's argument.
Existing data reconciled via a one-off (backup
data/audit/citation-edges-backup-*.csv): per source decision, dropped edges
whose cited number is absent from the discussion-only set — 82 of 398 removed
(incl. ערר 130/10 ↔ 1200-12-25); 316 genuine edges kept.
Invariants: G1 (correct at the source) · G2 (single reasoning-section selector,
shared with halacha extraction) · INV-LRN2 (quality-at-source).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Chaim
f63bd4df0f