Chaim
8b816c8b61
All checks were successful
Build & Deploy / build-and-deploy (push) Successful in 6s
After reading all 23 1xxx decisions from style_corpus DB (in addition to the 10 training files and 1130-25/1194-25 deep reads), synthesized two new operational documents: docs/daphna-precedent-network.md - Maps each legal issue to the specific precedent Daphna cites - 9 threshold issues (standing, השפר, סעיף 152, קנייני, פגמי פרסום, פסילה, עבירות בנייה) with her preferred quotes for each - 8 substantive issues (תכנון נקודתי vs כולל, חיקוק תכנית, סטייה ניכרת, 62א, חניה, תמ"א 38, תכניות ישנות, שימוש חורג) - Lists ~30 external precedents she cites consistently + ~15 personal precedents (her own canon — 1110/20 בעלז, 1112/22 שקופה, 1181/22 אדלר, 1130-25, etc.) - Distinguishes precedents she cites vs. those she does NOT cite docs/daphna-architecture-by-outcome.md - 7 distinct block-yod architectures keyed to outcome type: 1. Pure rejection (short, 555-2000 words) 2. Rejection after complex analysis (2500-4500) 3. Threshold dismissal + merits "ועל מנת לא לצאת בחסר" (mode F) 4. Three or more distinct issues (sub-headings) 5. Partial acceptance (full funnel architecture) 6. Joined appeals 7. Remand follow-up - Decision tree for the agent (4 questions → architecture choice) - Internal proportions table (opening 5-10%, doctrine 15-25%, etc.) - Costs matrix with 6 scenarios Updated docs/daphna-voice-fingerprint.md with section 6 (additions from 23-file corpus read): 2 new opening modes (F: threshold+merits, G: remand follow-up), nuanced sub-heading rule, self-citation of full analytical blocks, 10 new "we" verbs, 11 traditional phrases with sources, expanded costs matrix, transparency about petition outcomes, warning that 1015-24 is dissent (not Daphna's voice). Updated .claude/agents/legal-writer.md to require reading all 4 voice docs before block-yod (the "voice quartet"), with explicit decision tree integration. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>