The chair wanted an independent recommendation beside each tag, to reconsider
his own judgments. Adds a NON-ground-truth AI second-opinion:
- schema: halacha_goldset.ai_is_holding / ai_correct_type / ai_rationale /
ai_generated_at (additive).
- db.goldset_set_ai_recommendation + goldset_list now returns the ai_* fields.
- scripts/goldset_ai_recommend.py — local claude_session judges is_holding +
type + a one-line rationale per item, INDEPENDENTLY (own legal rubric).
Independent of the rule-based validators #81.8 measures → no circularity.
Never auto-applied; QA aid only.
- web-ui: each card shows "🤖 המלצת AI: הלכה/לא · type" + rationale and an
agreement/disagreement chip vs the human tag (amber on disagree); a
"⚠ אי-הסכמות AI (N)" filter to review only the conflicts.
Methodology note kept explicit: the human stays the ground truth; the AI is a
prompt to reconsider, not to copy.
Verified: tsc --noEmit 0; generator stores recs and flags disagreements with
existing human tags.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Chaim
0e35060d3d