"""Extract binding legal rules (הלכות) from external court rulings.

Runs Claude (via the local headless ``claude -p`` bridge) over the
legal_analysis / ruling / conclusion chunks of a precedent, returns a
structured list of halachot, validates each one against the source text,
embeds the rule statement, and stores everything as ``pending_review`` in
the ``halachot`` table.

All extraction is idempotent — calling ``extract(case_law_id)`` twice
deletes prior rows for that precedent first.

Trust model:
    Per chair decision, NO halacha is auto-published. Every extracted
    halacha enters with ``review_status='pending_review'``. The chair
    approves/rejects via the UI, and only ``approved`` (or ``published``)
    rows are visible to ``search_precedent_library`` and the writing
    agents.
"""

from __future__ import annotations

import asyncio
import logging
import re
from uuid import UUID

from legal_mcp import config
from legal_mcp.config import parse_llm_json
from legal_mcp.services import claude_session, db, embeddings, proofreader

logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)


# Concurrency model mirrors claims_extractor — each ``claude -p`` subprocess
# holds ~300 MB RSS, so we cap parallel chunks to keep the box healthy.
# Env-tunable (HALACHA_CHUNK_CONCURRENCY) — see config.py.
CHUNK_CONCURRENCY = config.HALACHA_CHUNK_CONCURRENCY

# Global cross-process serialization key for halacha extraction. Every
# extraction (whichever process/agent/driver launched it) takes a PostgreSQL
# advisory lock on this key first; if another extraction already holds it the
# call returns ``status='busy'`` and the request stays pending for the next
# drain. This makes "one extraction at a time" hold across SEPARATE OS
# processes (agent fallback retries spawn independent `python -c` drivers — an
# in-process Semaphore cannot see them). Root cause of the 2026-05-31 freeze:
# 4-5 overlapping driver processes × CHUNK_CONCURRENCY each → 12-16 concurrent
# xhigh `claude -p` procs → load 69 → hard reboot.
_HALACHA_EXTRACT_LOCK_KEY = 0x48414C41  # 'HALA'
CHUNK_RETRY_ATTEMPTS = 1

# If at least this fraction of chunks crash and the precedent yields zero
# halachot, treat the run as `extraction_failed` rather than `no_halachot`.
# Picked at 0.5 so a precedent that genuinely has no holdings (e.g. a remand
# ruling that just sends the case back) isn't misflagged just because a few
# chunks timed out, while a real rate-limit storm — which kills nearly every
# call — is correctly distinguished and re-tried by the caller.
EXTRACTION_FAILURE_THRESHOLD = 0.5

# Sections from which to extract. facts/intro/appellant_claims/respondent_claims
# never contain holdings, only positions, so we skip them.
EXTRACTABLE_SECTIONS = ("legal_analysis", "ruling", "conclusion")


# Two prompts — choose by source's is_binding flag.
#
# The binding prompt extracts strict halachot (rules a future panel MUST
# follow). It rejects obiter dicta, factual findings, and citations of
# other rulings that the present court only mentioned in passing.
#
# The persuasive prompt is for sources that don't establish binding law
# (most appeals committee decisions, district courts on planning matters,
# etc.). For those, the value is in **how the panel reasoned and applied**
# established law to facts — not in new halachot. The user explicitly
# wants to be able to cite "another committee reached the same conclusion"
# even though it is not binding.
#
# The schema's rule_type field accepts six values:
#   binding | interpretive | procedural | obiter | application | persuasive

HALACHA_EXTRACTION_PROMPT_BINDING = """אתה משפטן בכיר המתמחה בדיני תכנון ובניה (ועדות ערר, היטל השבחה, פיצויים לפי סעיף 197 לחוק התכנון והבניה). תפקידך: לחלץ הלכות מחייבות מתוך פסק דין/החלטה משפטית של ערכאה עליונה (עליון / מנהלי).

## הגדרות מחייבות

הלכה (binding rule) = כלל משפטי שהפסק קובע או מאמץ ומיישם, באופן שניתן להסתמך עליו בהחלטות עתידיות.

לא-הלכה (אין לחלץ):
- אמרת אגב (obiter dicta) — הערות שאינן הכרחיות להכרעה.
- ממצאים עובדתיים ספציפיים לתיק ("העורר לא הוכיח X").
- ציטוטי הלכות מפסקי דין אחרים שלא אומצו במפורש בפסק זה.
- הצהרות על דין קיים שאינן מיושמות בהכרעה.

הבחנה קריטית: כאשר הפסק מצטט הלכה מפסק קודם, חלץ אותה רק אם בית המשפט בפסק הנוכחי **מאמץ ומחיל** אותה (לא רק מזכיר אותה ברקע).

## תחומים אפשריים (practice_areas) — תחומי ועדת הערר בלבד
- rishuy_uvniya — רישוי ובניה (תיקי 1xxx: היתרים, שימוש חורג, תכניות, קווי בניין, גובה, חניה)
- betterment_levy — היטל השבחה (תיקי 8xxx: שומה, מערכות, תכניות המקנות בה, מועד קובע, סופיות ההחלטה)
- compensation_197 — פיצויים לפי ס' 197 (תיקי 9xxx: פגיעה במקרקעין, ירידת ערך, ס' 200/פטור)

הלכה אחת יכולה לחול על כמה תחומים — practice_areas הוא array ולא string יחיד.

## סוגי הלכה (rule_type)
- binding — הלכה מחייבת שהוחלה על התיק.
- interpretive — פרשנות סעיף חוק/תכנית שאומצה.
- procedural — כלל פרוצדורלי (סמכות, מועדים, הליכי שמיעה).
- obiter — אמרת אגב חשובה (חלץ רק אם משמעותית; סמן confidence נמוך).

## פלט נדרש
החזר JSON array בלבד, ללא markdown, ללא הסברים. דוגמה:
[
  {
    "rule_statement": "ניסוח הכלל בלשון משפטית מדויקת בגוף שלישי, 1-3 משפטים.",
    "rule_type": "binding",
    "reasoning_summary": "תמצית ההיגיון: למה בית המשפט הגיע לכלל הזה (1-2 משפטים).",
    "supporting_quote": "ציטוט מילולי מדויק מהפסק התומך בכלל. חייב להופיע מילה במילה בטקסט הקלט.",
    "page_reference": "פס' 12 / עמ' 8 — ככל שניתן לזהות מהקלט.",
    "practice_areas": ["betterment_levy"],
    "subject_tags": ["מועד_קביעת_שומה", "סופיות_ההחלטה"],
    "cites": ["עע\\"מ 3975/22"],
    "confidence": 0.85
  }
]

## כללי איכות
1. **נאמנות מוחלטת לציטוט** — supporting_quote חייב להיות הדבקה מדויקת מהקלט. אם אין ציטוט מתאים — אל תמציא הלכה.
2. **מספר הלכות** — פסק רגיל מכיל 1-4 הלכות מחייבות. אל תמתח את הרשימה. אם אין הלכה — החזר [].
3. **לא לפצל יתר על המידה** — אם שני סעיפים מבטאים את אותו עיקרון, אחד את הניסוח.
4. **שפה** — rule_statement בעברית משפטית מקצועית, לא צמצום מילולי של הציטוט.
5. **subject_tags** — 2-5 תגיות בעברית, snake_case (חניה, קווי_בניין, שיקול_דעת, פגם_פרוצדורלי, סמכות, מועדים, פגיעה_במקרקעין, ירידת_ערך).
6. **confidence** — 0..1. מתחת ל-0.7 = ספק לגבי היות זה הלכה מחייבת.
"""


HALACHA_EXTRACTION_PROMPT_PERSUASIVE = """אתה משפטן בכיר המתמחה בדיני תכנון ובניה. תפקידך: לחלץ עקרונות, יישומים ומסקנות מתוך החלטה של ועדת ערר אחרת או של בית משפט שאינו ערכאה עליונה לסוגיה.

## חשוב — מה לחלץ ומה לא

המקור הזה **אינו** מקור להלכות מחייבות חדשות (binding rules). הלכות מחייבות מגיעות מהעליון/מנהלי. עם זאת, יש כאן ערך משמעותי שצריך לחלץ — איך הפנל הזה ניתח ויישם את הדין הקיים. כשנכתוב החלטה עתידית, נצטט מהמקור הזה כ"גם ועדת הערר ב-X הגיעה למסקנה דומה" — לא כסמכות מחייבת, אלא כתמיכה משכנעת.

**יש לחלץ:**
- **יישום של הלכה ידועה** (rule_type=`application`) — הפנל החיל הלכה ידועה (של עליון/מנהלי) על עובדות הנידונות. תצטט את ניסוח הכלל **כפי שהוצג כאן** (לא בהכרח כפי שנקבע במקור) ואת התוצאה.
- **עקרון פרשני שאומץ** (rule_type=`interpretive`) — איך הפנל פירש סעיף חוק / תכנית, באופן שניתן לאמץ.
- **כלל פרוצדורלי** (rule_type=`procedural`) — קביעות בנושאי סמכות, מועדים, הליך.
- **מסקנה מנומקת ומשכנעת** (rule_type=`persuasive`) — מסקנה שלמה של הפנל בסוגיה, עם ההיגיון התומך, ניתנת לציטוט כאסמכתא משכנעת.

**אין לחלץ:**
- ממצאים עובדתיים ספציפיים לתיק ("העורר לא הוכיח X").
- ציטוטים מפסקי דין אחרים ללא ניתוח של הפנל.
- אמרות אגב חסרות חשיבות.

## תחומים אפשריים (practice_areas) — תחומי ועדת הערר בלבד
- rishuy_uvniya — רישוי ובניה (תיקי 1xxx: היתרים, שימוש חורג, תכניות, קווי בניין, גובה, חניה)
- betterment_levy — היטל השבחה (תיקי 8xxx: שומה, מערכות, תכניות המקנות בה, מועד קובע, סופיות ההחלטה)
- compensation_197 — פיצויים לפי ס' 197 (תיקי 9xxx: פגיעה במקרקעין, ירידת ערך, ס' 200/פטור)

## פלט נדרש
החזר JSON array בלבד, ללא markdown, ללא הסברים:
[
  {
    "rule_statement": "ניסוח הכלל / המסקנה / היישום בלשון משפטית מדויקת, 1-3 משפטים.",
    "rule_type": "application",
    "reasoning_summary": "תמצית ההיגיון של הפנל (1-2 משפטים).",
    "supporting_quote": "ציטוט מילולי מדויק מהקלט שתומך בכלל. חייב להופיע מילה במילה.",
    "page_reference": "פס' 12 / עמ' 8 — ככל שניתן לזהות.",
    "practice_areas": ["betterment_levy"],
    "subject_tags": ["מועד_קביעת_שומה", "תכנית_רחביה"],
    "cites": ["עע\\"מ 3975/22"],
    "confidence": 0.85
  }
]

## כללי איכות
1. **נאמנות מוחלטת לציטוט** — supporting_quote חייב להיות הדבקה מדויקת מהקלט. אם אין ציטוט מתאים — אל תוסיף את ההלכה.
2. **מספר הלכות** — החלטה ארוכה של ועדת ערר יכולה להניב 2-8 פריטים (יישומים + מסקנות). אם אין מה לחלץ — החזר [].
3. **rule_type מדויק** — application = יישום הלכה ידועה. interpretive = פרשנות. procedural = פרוצדורה. persuasive = מסקנה כללית בעלת ערך כאסמכתא.
4. **לא לפצל יתר על המידה** — שני סעיפים זהים מבחינה רעיונית = פריט אחד.
5. **שפה** — עברית משפטית מקצועית, גוף שלישי.
6. **subject_tags** — 2-5 תגיות בעברית, snake_case.
7. **confidence** — 0..1. דייק.
"""


_VALID_PRACTICE_AREAS = {"rishuy_uvniya", "betterment_levy", "compensation_197"}
_VALID_RULE_TYPES = {
    "binding", "interpretive", "procedural", "obiter",
    "application", "persuasive",
}


def _normalize_for_comparison(text: str) -> str:
    """Normalize Hebrew text for substring matching.

    Collapses whitespace and unifies the half-dozen Hebrew quote-mark
    variants. Use ``proofreader._fix_hebrew_quotes`` for the quote part
    so we stay consistent with the proofreader pipeline.
    """
    fixed = proofreader._fix_hebrew_quotes(text)
    # Collapse all whitespace (newlines, tabs, multiple spaces) to a single space.
    return re.sub(r"\s+", " ", fixed).strip()


def _verify_quote(supporting_quote: str, full_text: str) -> bool:
    """Return True if ``supporting_quote`` appears verbatim in ``full_text``
    after Hebrew quote/whitespace normalization.

    The LLM occasionally trims a leading/trailing word from the quote;
    we accept the quote if at least 90% of its characters match a
    contiguous substring of the source.
    """
    if not supporting_quote.strip():
        return False
    normalized_quote = _normalize_for_comparison(supporting_quote)
    normalized_text = _normalize_for_comparison(full_text)
    if not normalized_quote:
        return False
    if normalized_quote in normalized_text:
        return True
    # Fallback: try the inner 90% of the quote (drops boundary trim).
    if len(normalized_quote) >= 30:
        trim = max(2, len(normalized_quote) // 20)
        inner = normalized_quote[trim:-trim]
        if inner and inner in normalized_text:
            return True
    return False


def _coerce_halacha(raw: dict, is_binding: bool = True) -> dict | None:
    """Validate and normalize one LLM-returned halacha dict.

    Returns ``None`` if the entry is missing required fields. ``is_binding``
    only affects the default rule_type when the LLM returned an unknown
    value — for binding sources we default to ``binding``, otherwise to
    ``persuasive`` (never pretend an appeals committee created halacha).
    """
    if not isinstance(raw, dict):
        return None
    rule_statement = (raw.get("rule_statement") or "").strip()
    supporting_quote = (raw.get("supporting_quote") or "").strip()
    if not rule_statement or not supporting_quote:
        return None

    default_rule_type = "binding" if is_binding else "persuasive"
    rule_type = (raw.get("rule_type") or default_rule_type).strip().lower()
    if rule_type not in _VALID_RULE_TYPES:
        rule_type = default_rule_type
    # Guard: don't let a non-binding source produce 'binding' rule_type
    if not is_binding and rule_type == "binding":
        rule_type = "persuasive"

    practice_areas_raw = raw.get("practice_areas") or []
    if isinstance(practice_areas_raw, str):
        practice_areas_raw = [practice_areas_raw]
    practice_areas = [p for p in practice_areas_raw if p in _VALID_PRACTICE_AREAS]

    subject_tags_raw = raw.get("subject_tags") or []
    if isinstance(subject_tags_raw, str):
        subject_tags_raw = [subject_tags_raw]
    subject_tags = [str(t).strip() for t in subject_tags_raw if str(t).strip()]

    cites_raw = raw.get("cites") or []
    if isinstance(cites_raw, str):
        cites_raw = [cites_raw]
    cites = [str(c).strip() for c in cites_raw if str(c).strip()]

    try:
        confidence = float(raw.get("confidence", 0.0))
    except (TypeError, ValueError):
        confidence = 0.0
    confidence = max(0.0, min(1.0, confidence))

    return {
        "rule_statement": rule_statement,
        "rule_type": rule_type,
        "reasoning_summary": (raw.get("reasoning_summary") or "").strip(),
        "supporting_quote": supporting_quote,
        "page_reference": (raw.get("page_reference") or "").strip(),
        "practice_areas": practice_areas,
        "subject_tags": subject_tags,
        "cites": cites,
        "confidence": confidence,
    }


async def _extract_chunk(
    chunk_text: str,
    section_type: str,
    chunk_index: int,
    chunk_total: int,
    context: str,
    is_binding: bool,
    effort: str | None = None,
) -> tuple[list[dict], bool]:
    """Run the halacha extractor on one chunk with retry.

    Returns ``(halachot, succeeded)`` so the caller can distinguish "Claude
    said there are no halachot here" (`(_, True)`) from "every attempt
    crashed/timed out" (`(_, False)`). Without this distinction a precedent
    that hit a rate-limit storm looks identical to one that genuinely has no
    halachot — and gets silently marked `no_halachot`.

    The prompt branches on ``is_binding`` so non-binding sources (other
    appeals committees, district courts) yield application/persuasive
    entries rather than a forced 0-result strict halacha pass.
    """
    base_prompt = (
        HALACHA_EXTRACTION_PROMPT_BINDING if is_binding
        else HALACHA_EXTRACTION_PROMPT_PERSUASIVE
    )
    chunk_label = f" (חלק {chunk_index + 1}/{chunk_total})" if chunk_total > 1 else ""
    # Pass the static instruction prompt as `system` so the SDK path can cache
    # it (5-min ephemeral). Only the per-chunk content varies via `prompt`.
    user_msg = (
        f"## הקלט\n"
        f"סוג קטע: {section_type}\n"
        f"{context}{chunk_label}\n\n"
        f"--- תחילת הטקסט ---\n{chunk_text}\n--- סוף הטקסט ---"
    )
    last_err: Exception | None = None
    for attempt in range(CHUNK_RETRY_ATTEMPTS + 1):
        try:
            result = await claude_session.query_json(
                user_msg,
                system=base_prompt,
                model=config.HALACHA_EXTRACT_MODEL or None,
                effort=(effort or config.HALACHA_EXTRACT_EFFORT) or None,
            )
        except Exception as e:
            last_err = e
            logger.warning(
                "halacha_extractor chunk %d/%d attempt %d raised: %s",
                chunk_index + 1, chunk_total, attempt + 1, e,
            )
            continue
        if isinstance(result, list):
            return result, True
        logger.warning(
            "halacha_extractor chunk %d/%d attempt %d returned non-list (%s)",
            chunk_index + 1, chunk_total, attempt + 1, type(result).__name__,
        )
    logger.error(
        "halacha_extractor chunk %d/%d failed after %d attempts: %s",
        chunk_index + 1, chunk_total, CHUNK_RETRY_ATTEMPTS + 1, last_err,
    )
    return [], False


async def extract(case_law_id: UUID | str, force: bool = False,
                  effort: str | None = None) -> dict:
    """Extract halachot from an uploaded precedent — globally serialized.

    ``effort`` overrides the per-chunk LLM effort (default
    ``config.HALACHA_EXTRACT_EFFORT`` = xhigh). Bulk queue-drains pass the
    lighter ``config.HALACHA_BULK_EXTRACT_EFFORT`` to cut wall-clock at scale.

    ``force=False`` (default) RESUMES: chunks already extracted (checkpointed)
    are skipped, so a crash/interrupt never loses completed work or re-pays for
    it. ``force=True`` wipes prior halachot + checkpoints and re-extracts all
    (used by explicit re-extraction).

    Takes a PostgreSQL advisory lock so only ONE extraction runs at a time
    across ALL processes (agent retries + batch ``process_pending`` spawn
    independent OS drivers; an in-process Semaphore can't see them). If another
    extraction already holds the lock this returns ``status='busy'`` and the
    precedent stays pending for the next drain — no second xhigh run piles on
    (this is the fix for the 2026-05-31 box freeze).

    Returns:
        ``{"status": "...", "extracted": N, "verified": M, "stored": K, ...}``
    """
    if isinstance(case_law_id, str):
        case_law_id = UUID(case_law_id)

    pool = await db.get_pool()
    lock_conn = await pool.acquire()
    try:
        got = await lock_conn.fetchval(
            "SELECT pg_try_advisory_lock($1)", _HALACHA_EXTRACT_LOCK_KEY,
        )
        if not got:
            logger.warning(
                "halacha extract: global lock held by another extraction — "
                "skipping %s (stays pending for next drain)", case_law_id,
            )
            return {
                "status": "busy", "extracted": 0, "stored": 0,
                "case_law_id": str(case_law_id),
            }
        try:
            return await _extract_impl(case_law_id, force=force, effort=effort)
        finally:
            await lock_conn.fetchval(
                "SELECT pg_advisory_unlock($1)", _HALACHA_EXTRACT_LOCK_KEY,
            )
    finally:
        await pool.release(lock_conn)


async def _extract_impl(case_law_id: UUID, force: bool = False,
                        effort: str | None = None) -> dict:
    """Core extraction (caller holds the global advisory lock for the duration).

    Crash-safe + resumable: each chunk's halachot are stored AND the chunk is
    checkpointed (``precedent_chunks.halacha_extracted_at``) the moment it
    finishes. A crash/interrupt loses at most the in-flight chunk; a re-run
    resumes — already-done chunks are skipped, failed/pending chunks retried.
    ``force=True`` wipes prior halachot + checkpoints and re-extracts all.
    """
    record = await db.get_case_law(case_law_id)
    if not record:
        return {"status": "not_found", "extracted": 0, "stored": 0}

    is_binding = bool(record.get("is_binding"))

    # Try the targeted sections first (legal_analysis / ruling / conclusion).
    # If the chunker labeled everything as 'other' (common when a ruling
    # uses non-standard headings or the section markers aren't bracketed
    # cleanly), fall back to ALL chunks — better to over-include than to
    # silently skip a ruling that has reasoning under an unexpected label.
    chunks = await db.list_precedent_chunks(
        case_law_id, section_types=EXTRACTABLE_SECTIONS,
    )
    if not chunks:
        chunks = await db.list_precedent_chunks(case_law_id)
        if chunks:
            logger.info(
                "halacha_extractor: case_law=%s — no targeted sections, "
                "falling back to all %d chunks",
                case_law_id, len(chunks),
            )
    if not chunks:
        await db.set_case_law_halacha_status(case_law_id, "completed")
        return {"status": "no_chunks", "extracted": 0, "stored": 0}

    # force = clean slate; otherwise resume (skip already-checkpointed chunks).
    if force:
        await db.reset_halacha_extraction(case_law_id)
        for c in chunks:
            c["halacha_extracted_at"] = None

    await db.set_case_law_halacha_status(case_law_id, "processing")

    pending = [c for c in chunks if c.get("halacha_extracted_at") is None]

    # Legacy guard: a precedent extracted before V25 has halachot but NO chunk
    # checkpoints. Re-extracting (append-per-chunk) would DUPLICATE them. If
    # nothing is checkpointed yet but halachot already exist, backfill the
    # checkpoints and treat as complete instead of re-extracting.
    if not force and len(pending) == len(chunks):
        already = await db.list_halachot(case_law_id=case_law_id, limit=1)
        if already:
            await db.mark_all_chunks_extracted(case_law_id)
            total = len(await db.list_halachot(case_law_id=case_law_id, limit=10_000))
            await db.set_case_law_halacha_status(case_law_id, "completed")
            logger.info(
                "halacha_extractor: case_law=%s legacy-backfill — %d existing "
                "halachot, checkpoints backfilled (no re-extract).",
                case_law_id, total,
            )
            return {"status": "completed", "extracted": total, "stored": total,
                    "legacy_backfill": True, "total_chunks": len(chunks)}

    if not pending:
        # Resume found nothing left — every chunk already extracted.
        total = len(await db.list_halachot(case_law_id=case_law_id, limit=10_000))
        await db.set_case_law_halacha_status(case_law_id, "completed")
        return {"status": "completed", "extracted": total, "stored": total,
                "resumed": True, "total_chunks": len(chunks)}

    full_text = record.get("full_text") or ""
    citation = record.get("case_number", "")
    court = record.get("court", "")
    date_str = str(record.get("date") or "")
    context = f"מקור: {citation} — {court}, {date_str}"
    idx_by_id = {c["id"]: i for i, c in enumerate(chunks)}

    sem = asyncio.Semaphore(CHUNK_CONCURRENCY)
    store_lock = asyncio.Lock()  # serialize per-chunk stores (index continuity)
    stored_total = 0
    failed_chunks = 0

    async def _process(chunk_row: dict) -> None:
        nonlocal stored_total, failed_chunks
        async with sem:
            items, ok = await _extract_chunk(
                chunk_row["content"], chunk_row["section_type"],
                idx_by_id[chunk_row["id"]], len(chunks), context, is_binding,
                effort,
            )
        if not ok:
            failed_chunks += 1  # leave chunk un-checkpointed → retried on resume
            return
        cleaned: list[dict] = []
        for raw in items:
            coerced = _coerce_halacha(raw, is_binding=is_binding)
            if coerced is None:
                continue
            coerced["quote_verified"] = _verify_quote(
                coerced["supporting_quote"], full_text,
            )
            cleaned.append(coerced)
        if cleaned:
            embed_inputs = [
                f"{h['rule_statement']} — {h['reasoning_summary']}".strip(" —")
                for h in cleaned
            ]
            try:
                vectors = await embeddings.embed_texts(embed_inputs, input_type="document")
            except Exception as e:
                logger.error("halacha_extractor: embeddings failed: %s", e)
                vectors = [None] * len(cleaned)
            for h, vec in zip(cleaned, vectors):
                h["embedding"] = vec
        # Store this chunk's halachot AND checkpoint the chunk, atomically.
        async with store_lock:
            stored_total += await db.store_halachot_for_chunk(
                case_law_id, chunk_row["id"], cleaned,
            )

    await asyncio.gather(*[_process(c) for c in pending])

    # Decide final status from what's LEFT (re-read checkpoints).
    after = await db.list_precedent_chunks(case_law_id, section_types=EXTRACTABLE_SECTIONS)
    if not after:
        after = await db.list_precedent_chunks(case_law_id)
    still_pending = sum(1 for c in after if c.get("halacha_extracted_at") is None)
    total = len(await db.list_halachot(case_law_id=case_law_id, limit=10_000))

    if still_pending:
        # Some chunks failed this run. Leave status 'processing' so a resume
        # continues them (no progress is lost — done chunks are checkpointed).
        if total == 0 and failed_chunks >= len(pending) * EXTRACTION_FAILURE_THRESHOLD:
            logger.error(
                "halacha_extractor: case_law=%s extraction_failed — %d/%d pending "
                "chunks failed, 0 stored. status left 'processing' for retry.",
                case_law_id, failed_chunks, len(pending),
            )
            return {"status": "extraction_failed", "extracted": 0, "stored": 0,
                    "failed_chunks": failed_chunks, "pending_chunks": still_pending,
                    "total_chunks": len(chunks)}
        logger.warning(
            "halacha_extractor: case_law=%s partial — %d chunks still pending, "
            "%d halachot stored so far. status 'processing' (resume to finish).",
            case_law_id, still_pending, total,
        )
        return {"status": "partial", "extracted": total, "stored": stored_total,
                "pending_chunks": still_pending, "total_chunks": len(chunks)}

    # All chunks done.
    stored = total
    verified = sum(1 for h in await db.list_halachot(case_law_id=case_law_id, limit=10_000)
                   if h.get("quote_verified"))
    await db.set_case_law_halacha_status(case_law_id, "completed")

    logger.info(
        "halacha_extractor: case_law=%s completed — %d halachot stored "
        "(%d new this run), %d quote-verified, %d chunks",
        case_law_id, total, stored_total, verified, len(chunks),
    )
    return {
        "status": "completed",
        "extracted": total,
        "verified": verified,
        "stored": stored,
        "stored_this_run": stored_total,
        "total_chunks": len(chunks),
    }