mcp-server/src/legal_mcp/services/chunker.py

@@ -22,18 +22,23 @@ from legal_mcp import config
 # court rulings use slightly different vocabulary (פסק דין, נימוקים, סוף דבר).
 SECTION_PATTERNS = [
     (r"רקע\s*עובדתי|רקע\s*כללי|העובדות|הרקע", "facts"),
-    # appellant_claims: covers singular (עורר/עוררת, מערער/מערערת) and plural
-    # (עוררים/עוררין, מערערים). Previously only plural was matched, so headers
-    # like "טענות העורר:" were silently absorbed into the preceding section.
+    # parties_claims: bilateral section common in Supreme Court / administrative
+    # court decisions ("טענות הצדדים", "טיעוני הצדדים"). Not split by side.
     (
-        r"(?:טענות|עיקר\s*טענות)\s*ה(?:עוררי[םן]|עורר[ת]?|מערערי[םן]|מערער[ת]?)",
+        r"(?:טענות|טיעוני|עמדות)\s*הצדדים",
+        "parties_claims",
+    ),
+    # appellant_claims: covers singular (עורר/עוררת, מערער/מערערת) and plural
+    # (עוררים/עוררין, מערערים), plus court-format verb "טיעוני".
+    (
+        r"(?:טענות|עיקר\s*טענות|טיעוני)\s*ה(?:עוררי[םן]|עורר[ת]?|מערערי[םן]|מערער[ת]?)",
         "appellant_claims",
     ),
     # respondent_claims: covers singular (משיב/משיבה) and plural (משיבים/משיבין),
-    # plus verb forms תשובת/תגובת. "טענות המשיבה:" (feminine singular) was the
-    # root cause of halacha 8181-21 index-11 being extracted from party claims.
+    # plus verb forms תשובת/תגובת/טיעוני. "טענות המשיבה:" (feminine singular) was
+    # the root cause of halacha 8181-21 index-11 being extracted from party claims.
     (
-        r"(?:טענות|תשובת|תגובת|עיקר\s*טענות)\s*ה(?:משיבי[םן]|משיב[ה]?)",
+        r"(?:טענות|תשובת|תגובת|עיקר\s*טענות|טיעוני)\s*ה(?:משיבי[םן]|משיב[ה]?)",
         "respondent_claims",
     ),
     (r"דיון\s*והכרעה|דיון|הכרעה|ניתוח\s*משפטי|המסגרת\s*המשפטית|נימוקים", "legal_analysis"),

mcp-server/src/legal_mcp/services/halacha_extractor.py

@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ EXTRACTABLE_SECTIONS = ("legal_analysis", "ruling", "conclusion")
 # reasoning that merely landed under 'other' is still reached. Raises precision
 # on the dominant Facts↔Reasoning confusion class (#81.6; INV-LRN2
 # quality-at-source; LegalSeg / rhetorical-role labeling).
-NON_REASONING_SECTIONS = ("facts", "appellant_claims", "respondent_claims", "intro")
+NON_REASONING_SECTIONS = ("facts", "appellant_claims", "respondent_claims", "parties_claims", "intro")
 
 
 # Two prompts — choose by source's is_binding flag.