מנגנון-הייצור (claude_session→claude -p) לא העביר model/effort: BLOCK_CONFIG
הגדיר temp+model per-בלוק שהיו מטא-דאטה-מת (block_writer.py:447 העביר רק
prompt/timeout/tools). הייצור רץ על מודל ברירת-המחדל של ה-CLI עם פרומפטים-חופשיים
→ מקור אי-העקביות בטיוטת-הביניים.
תיקון (עקביות-מבנית, WS5):
- נעיצת model="claude-opus-4-8" (GENERATION_MODEL) לכל בלוקי-ה-AI + effort per-בלוק
שמועבר בפועל דרך claude_session.query → `claude -p --model --effort`.
מפת-effort: ה=medium · ו=medium · ז=high · ח=medium · ט=high · יא=high · י=xhigh.
- ניסוח-פתיחה קבוע לבלוק-ה (תמיד "לפנינו ערר…", סוף ל-OR "עניינה של החלטה זו").
- מבנה-פנימי קבוע לבלוק-ה; סדר-בלוקים בייצוא כבר קבוע (_INTERIM_BLOCK_ORDER).
- הסרת שדות temp/model המתים מ-BLOCK_CONFIG; "temp" deprecated (Opus 4.7/4.8 דוחים
temperature→400). decision_blocks.temperature נשמר=0 לתאימות-עמודה בלבד.
- timeout נגזר מ-effort (לא מפיצול sonnet/opus שכבר לא קיים).
- עדכון endpoint reference /api/settings/mcp/blocks + blocks-tab + McpBlock לחשוף effort.
- ספ: docs/block-schema.md §3 (effort מחליף temperature), docs/spec/06-export.md
(דטרמיניזם-מבני של טיוטת-הביניים).
G2 (מקור-אמת יחיד) — אין מסלול-ייצור מקביל: write_interim_draft מתזמר את אותו
write_and_store_block→write_block של ההחלטה המלאה.
claude_session-local-only — הייצור נשאר דרך גשר-ה-CLI, לא SDK/קונטיינר.
INV-EX1 — סדר-ייצוא דטרמיניסטי נשמר; G11 — עקרונות-הכתיבה ל-12 הבלוקים נשמרים.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
style_distance.measure_corpus_ratios(): מפצל כל החלטה ב-style_corpus לסעיפים
(chunker) ומחשב ממוצע %-סעיף — אגרגט "_all" + פר-תוצאה (כשיש). cached.
get_style_guide מציג שורת "נמדד בפועל" עם ⚠️ על פער מטווח-היעד.
מצב נוכחי: style_corpus.outcome לא מאוכלס → מוצג אגרגט כל-ההחלטות (n=48:
רקע 26.4% / טענות 9.7% / דיון 43.8% / סיכום 20.1%); פיצול לפי-תוצאה future-ready.
המדידה גם מאירה מגבלות זיהוי-סעיפים (כוונת T10 — לסמן פער לבדיקה). חופף-חלקית
ל-T7 שמודד adherence per-draft; זה מודד את הקורפוס. כשל מדידה מוצג, לא נבלע.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
הפרוסה האחרונה של GAP-48 (INV-TOOL1). 18 כלי drafting הומרו ל-{status,data,message}
דרך tools/envelope.py — כולל מסלול הפקת-ההחלטה הקריטי.
עיקרון לכלים עם כשל משמעותי (export_docx/revise_draft/apply_user_edit): err()
ברמת-המעטפת — כך שהסוכן והמשתמש רואים את הכשל; failed_gates רוכב ב-data.
שאר הכלים: ok(data=payload) להצלחה, err להיעדר-תיק/קלט-שגוי/חריגה.
6 צרכני-app.py חוּוטו (get_decision_template, apply_user_edit ×2, revise_draft,
list_bookmarks, export_docx) עם envelope_unwrap + בדיקת status=="error"→4xx,
לשמירת חוזה-ה-API (X6) ללא-שינוי. test_export_qa_gate עודכן לחוזה החדש.
בדיקות: 182/182 עוברים (כולל שערי-QA של הייצוא).
GAP-48 סגור: כל ~12 משפחות-הכלים אחידות. נותר ב-FU-14: GAP-49/50 (שובר), GAP-54.
Invariants: משלים INV-TOOL1 + G2. מתועד ב-X9 (נסגר) + gap-audit פרוסה 7.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
ה-provenance (document_id, page_number, score) כבר נשלף ב-search_similar אך
נזרק בבניית פלט draft_section. כעת מוחזר לכל קטע ב-case_documents/precedents,
כך שהכותב יכול לעקוב אחורה אל מסמך-המקור והעמוד ולצטטם, ולא לסמוך על תוכן
חסר-מקור. תוספתי בלבד — אין צרכן שמפרסר את מפתחות-הפלט, תואם-לאחור.
נותר ב-GAP-47: העברת הנחיות-יו"ר מ-analysis-and-research.md ל-DB
(get_chair_directions) — שינוי-מסלול גדול יותר, לפרוסה נפרדת.
Invariants: מקיים INV-TOOL4 (מקור-אמת נגיש) + G9 (provenance). לא נוגע ב-G2/G1.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
תוספתי בלבד, אפס שבירת-תאימות. שני invariants מחוזה-כלי-ה-MCP (X9):
GAP-44 (INV-TOOL4, סימטריית extract/get): נוסף get_appraiser_facts — ה-get
המקביל ל-extract_appraiser_facts. קורא list_appraiser_facts + detect_appraiser_conflicts
מה-DB ללא חילוץ-LLM יקר ולא-דטרמיניסטי. מחזיר count=0 (לא שגיאה) אם טרם חולץ.
GAP-53 (INV-TOOL5, limit-caps / OWASP API4:2023): נוסף _clamp_limit (תקרה 200,
non-positive→max) על ~13 כלי list/search ב-server.py (case_list, search_*,
precedent_library_list, halachot_pending, missing_precedent_list, list_*_citations…).
list_chair_feedback קיבל param limit חדש (server→workflow→db עם LIMIT) — היה ללא תקרה כלל.
לא הוסף get_appraiser_facts ל-frontmatter של סוכנים (INV-AG3 "לא עודף" — ההוראות
עוד לא מפנות אליו; חיווט = follow-up). נותר ב-FU-14: GAP-45/48/49/50/51/52.
עודכנו docs/spec/X9 (INV-TOOL4/5) ו-gap-audit (סטטוס פרוסה 1).
אומת: py_compile על 4 קבצי הקוד. אימות runtime (restart MCP server) נדחה עד
שהחילוץ הפעיל של היו"ר יסתיים.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
block-he (פתיחה ניטרלית) was previously emitted only in final decisions.
For interim drafts shown to the chair before ruling, including a neutral
opening helps the chair confirm framing before approving downstream blocks.
Skipped if empty, so legacy cases without block-he are unaffected.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The case repo is the user's backup, so anything in the dir must end up
on Gitea. Two layers:
1. Periodic sweep (every 30s) — git_sync.sweep_loop runs as a FastAPI
background task. It scans every case dir, runs git status --porcelain
on each, and commit_and_push's any dirty changes with an auto-built
Hebrew message ("אוטו: טיוטות (2) · מסמכים"). Catches files written
outside the API path: agent research artefacts, manual edits, etc.
2. Explicit commits at known write paths — DOCX export, interim draft,
apply_user_edit, revise_draft, mark-final, analysis DOCX export.
These give immediate feedback with descriptive messages instead of
waiting up to 30s for the sweep.
safe.directory injection added to _git_env so sweep + explicit commits
work even when the running uid differs from the case-dir owner (host
runs vs. uniform-root container).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The "על כן" pattern for block-yod-bet was too greedy and matched mid-discussion
transitional sentences (e.g. "על כן, במקום בו..."), which caused forward-scan
to skip block-yod-alef ("סוף דבר") via the pointer advance.
Tightened to require an operative subject (אנו / הערר / הוועדה / ועדת הערר)
so terminal "על כן, אנו מחליטים" still matches but mid-block transitions don't.
Added structural_fallback for cover blocks (alef/bet/gimel/dalet) — these are
template metadata not present in user-edited DOCX bodies. Inject zero-content
anchors so apply_user_edit can still target them later. The frontend toast
distinguishes real content gaps from fallback anchors.
Also expanded heading patterns based on training corpus inspection:
- block-vav: על המקרקעין חלות / במצב התכנוני / התכניות החלות
- block-zayin: טענות העוררת
- block-chet: עיקר תגובת המשיב
- block-tet: הדיון בוועדת הערר
For case 1130-25, this raises detection from 6/12 to 11/12 blocks — only
block-yod-bet remains missing (Daphna's edit ends at "סוף דבר" + numbered
ruling, no terminal "ההחלטה" or "על כן אנו מחליטים" paragraph).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Lets the chair generate a partial decision DOCX before the discussion-and-
ruling block is decided. Same template, skill and DOCX styling as the final
decision (David, RTL, bookmarks) — only the block selection and order differ:
רקע (ו) → תכניות+היתרים (ט) → טענות (ז) → הליכים (ח). The opening (ה),
ruling (י), summary (יא), and signatures (יב) are omitted.
- New appraiser_facts table + CRUD + conflict detection in db.py (V5 schema).
Conflict = same plan/permit identifier reported differently by 2+ appraisers.
- New appraiser_facts_extractor service: per-appraisal Claude extraction of
plans + permits with raw quotes and page numbers.
- block-tet prompt extended with a permits sub-section sourced from the
extracted facts, plus an explicit instruction to flag inter-appraiser
conflicts in neutral wording without resolving them (deferred to block-yod).
- block-chet prompt extended with a post-hearing materials context sourced
from documents.metadata.is_post_hearing.
- docx_exporter.export_decision now accepts mode='interim' which reorders
the blocks per the chair's mental model and writes
טיוטת-ביניים-v{N}.docx (versioned independently of regular drafts).
- 3 new MCP tools: extract_appraiser_facts, write_interim_draft,
export_interim_draft. write_interim_draft auto-runs extraction if the
appraiser_facts table is empty for the case.
Fixes critical bug in 1033-25: user-uploaded עריכה-*.docx files were
orphaned on disk while exports kept rebuilding from stale DB blocks.
New architecture:
- User-uploaded DOCX becomes the source of truth (cases.active_draft_path)
- System edits via XML surgery with real Word <w:ins>/<w:del> revisions
- User can Accept/Reject each change from within Word
Components:
- docx_reviser.py: XML surgery for Track Changes (15 tests)
- docx_retrofit.py: retroactive bookmark injection with Hebrew marker
detection + heading heuristic (9 tests)
- docx_exporter.py: emits bookmarks around each of the 12 blocks
- 3 new MCP tools: apply_user_edit, list_bookmarks, revise_draft
- 4 new/updated endpoints: upload (auto-registers active draft),
/exports/revise, /exports/bookmarks, /exports/{filename}/retrofit,
/active-draft
- DB migration: cases.active_draft_path column
- UI: correct banner using real v-numbers, "מקור האמת" badge,
detailed upload toast with bookmarks_added/missing_blocks
- agents: legal-exporter (3 export modes), legal-ceo (stage G for
revision handling), legal-writer (revision mode)
Multi-tenancy:
- Works for both CMP (1xxx cases) and CMPA (8xxx/9xxx cases)
- New revise-draft skill added to both companies
- deploy-track-changes.sh syncs skills CMP ↔ CMPA
- retrofit_case.py: one-off retrofit of existing files
Tests: 34 passing (15 reviser + 9 retrofit + 4 exporter bookmarks + 6 e2e)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Support ingestion of betterment levy (היטל השבחה) decisions into a
separate training corpus (CMPA). Key changes:
- Add .doc file extraction via LibreOffice conversion in extractor
- Add practice_area/appeal_subtype columns to style_corpus table
- Route training files to cmp/ or cmpa/ subdirs based on appeal subtype
- Fix derive_subtype to handle ARAR-YY-NNNN format (was matching year digit)
- Expose practice_area/appeal_subtype params in MCP upload_training tool
- Add appeal_subtype filter to analyze_style for per-type style analysis
- Update betterment levy methodology in lessons.py: checklist (from generic
to corpus-based), opening/closing strategies, and discussion rules
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Closes the loop so דפנה's positions (written inline in the UI and
saved to analysis-and-research.md) automatically become binding
direction for the legal-writer agent — no manual copy-paste,
no bypass.
Backend:
- research_md.extract_chair_directions(path) returns a compact dict
with status (missing/empty/partial/complete), filled_count,
empty_count, and a reduced list of threshold_claims + issues each
with {id, number, title, direction}. Designed to be directly usable
as direction_doc by the writer.
- New MCP tool: drafting.get_chair_directions(case_number) wraps the
helper, resolves the case research file path via config.find_case_dir,
returns formatted JSON.
- Registered in server.py as mcp__legal-ai__get_chair_directions.
legal-writer agent update:
- Adds get_chair_directions to the tools list.
- New mandatory "שלב 1ב" before any block writing: call
get_chair_directions, branch on status.
- missing → halt, report "legal-analyst לא רץ עדיין"
- empty → halt, instruct Dafna to fill positions via the UI URL
- partial → halt unless user confirms; write only filled sections
- complete → proceed
- New "שלב 1ג" constructs an internal direction_doc from the
received chair rulings before writing block י.
- Block י section expanded with 5 binding rules:
1. Open each discussion with Dafna's ruling as the thesis
2. Frame the reasoning in her style (use get_style_guide phrases)
3. Match her tone (decisive vs nuanced)
4. Must NOT contradict her position — if she disagreed with your
own inclination, her position rules
5. Use legal_questions from the analysis file as the analytical
structure (principle question first, concrete application second)
- New bullet section for block יא: summarize each chair ruling
briefly, state final outcome, close with the signed date formula.
Verified all four status paths (missing/empty/partial/complete) via
local test. Now Dafna's workflow is fully end-to-end: she reads the
analyst report in the UI, fills "עמדת ועדת הערר" in each card, hits
blur to auto-save, then triggers legal-writer — which picks up her
positions as direction without any file shuffle.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
New architecture: MCP provides context, Claude Code writes.
New functions:
- get_block_context(case_id, block_id) → returns full context package
(prompt, source docs, claims, direction, precedents, style guide)
WITHOUT calling Anthropic API
- save_block_content(case_id, block_id, content) → saves block to DB
New MCP tools: get_block_context, save_block_content
The old write_block (API-based) still works as fallback.
The new flow uses Claude Code's own model (Opus 4.6, 1M context)
which has no separate API billing.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Add expected_outcome field to cases (rejection/partial/full/betterment_levy)
- New lessons.py module with golden ratios, templates, and drafting guidance per outcome type
- Style analyzer now uses Opus with full decision text (no truncation), with multi-pass fallback for large corpora
- Drafting tool provides outcome-specific templates, section guidance, and ratio comments
- Improved JSON extraction with bracket-matching fallback
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Ezer Mishpati - AI legal decision drafting system with:
- MCP server (FastMCP) with document processing pipeline
- Web upload interface (FastAPI) for file upload and classification
- pgvector-based semantic search
- Hebrew legal document chunking and embedding
