Install git in Docker image and wrap all subprocess git calls in
try/except so a missing or failing git binary never kills an upload
that already succeeded.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Backend changes cherry-picked from ui-rewrite branch to enable
feedback API endpoints for the Next.js staging UI.
- chair_feedback DB table + API endpoints (GET/POST/PATCH)
- Content checklists by appeal subtype injected into block-yod prompt
- MCP tools for recording and listing chair feedback
- Corpus analysis documentation (24 decisions)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
New self-contained table + MCP tools + FastAPI endpoints for letting
the chair attach external case-law quotes (quote + citation מראה מקום,
optional chair note, optional archived PDF) to either a specific
threshold_claim / issue or the case as a whole.
Data model
- case_precedents (SCHEMA_V5_SQL) — case_id, section_id NULL/
"threshold_N"/"issue_N", quote, citation (free-text), chair_note,
pdf_document_id FK to documents, denormalized practice_area for
cross-case library filtering.
- Deliberately NOT linked to the existing case_law table — that one
has UNIQUE(case_number) which would force parsing the free-text
citation into a structured key. A backfill pass into case_law is
a later follow-up once the UI stabilizes.
- db.py gains 4 helpers: create_case_precedent, list_case_precedents,
delete_case_precedent, search_precedent_library. The last uses
DISTINCT ON (citation) for the cross-case typeahead so each
precedent appears once even if reused across many cases.
MCP tools (legal_mcp/tools/precedents.py)
- precedent_attach, precedent_list, precedent_remove,
precedent_search_library — registered in server.py.
FastAPI (web/app.py)
- POST /api/cases/{n}/precedents — create, with PrecedentCreateRequest
- POST /api/cases/{n}/precedents/upload-pdf — one-shot PDF upload to
a dedicated documents/precedents/ subdirectory, creates a
documents row with doc_type="precedent_archive" and no text
extraction (archive only)
- GET /api/cases/{n}/precedents — list
- DELETE /api/precedents/{id} — uses path param since precedent_id
is a UUID (slash-safe, unlike case numbers)
- GET /api/precedents/search?q=...&practice_area=... — library
typeahead
Block-writer integration into _build_precedents_context is a deferred
follow-up — Phase 1 surfaces the feature in the compose UI only.
Plan: ~/.claude/plans/woolly-cooking-graham.md
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Wires a new case-deletion path across the three layers that needed it:
- db.delete_case(case_id) — single SQL DELETE; documents, chunks, and
qa_results cascade via existing schema FKs, audit_log nullifies.
- cases_tools.case_delete(case_number, remove_files=False) — MCP tool
wrapper. File tree on disk is kept by default (audit trail); pass
remove_files=True for a hard delete.
- DELETE /api/cases?case_number=... — FastAPI endpoint taking the case
number as a QUERY param rather than a path segment. Case numbers
like "1000/0426" can't be passed through a path parameter because
FastAPI routing decodes %2F before matching, so a query param is
the only shape that works for historical data.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adds two orthogonal columns — practice_area (top-level legal domain:
appeals_committee / national_insurance / labor_law) and appeal_subtype
(building_permit / betterment_levy / compensation_197) — denormalized
into cases, documents, document_chunks, decisions, and style_corpus so
vector searches can filter without JOINs.
Why: the system handles two unrelated sub-domains under the same
appeals committee (1xxx building permits and 8xxx/9xxx betterment/197),
with different rules and writing style. Without a separation axis,
search_similar() and the block-writer's precedent lookup were free to
surface betterment-levy paragraphs while drafting a building-permit
decision — a real risk of cross-domain contamination. The same axis
also lets future domains (national insurance, labor law) coexist
without separate schemas.
Schema (V4 migration in db.py):
- ALTER ... ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS on all five tables + composite
indexes (practice_area first).
- Idempotent backfill: case_number ~ '^1' → building_permit, '^8' →
betterment_levy, '^9' → compensation_197; propagated to documents,
chunks, and decisions via case_id; training-corpus rows (case_id NULL)
default to appeals_committee.
Code:
- New services/practice_area.py with derive_subtype, validate, and
is_override + enum constants.
- db.create_case / create_document / store_chunks / create_decision
inherit practice_area from the parent case (or take an explicit
override for the case_id=None training corpus).
- db.search_similar and search_similar_paragraphs accept practice_area
+ appeal_subtype filters using the denormalized columns.
- tools/search.py auto-resolves the filter from case_number when given.
- block_writer._build_precedents_context now passes the active case's
practice_area to search_similar_paragraphs — closes the contamination
hole for the discussion-block precedent fetch.
- tools/cases.case_create auto-derives subtype from case_number; an
explicit override that disagrees writes a case_subtype_override entry
to audit_log so we can spot bad classifications later.
- tools/documents.document_upload_training tags new training material
with practice_area + subtype end-to-end (corpus, document, chunks).
UI (web/static/index.html + web/app.py):
- New-case wizard gets a practice_area dropdown (others disabled until
national_insurance / labor_law arrive) and an appeal_subtype dropdown
with JS auto-fill from the case-number prefix; manual edits stick.
- Case header shows a blue badge with practice_area · subtype.
- CaseCreateRequest plumbs both fields through to cases_tools.case_create.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Closes the loop so דפנה's positions (written inline in the UI and
saved to analysis-and-research.md) automatically become binding
direction for the legal-writer agent — no manual copy-paste,
no bypass.
Backend:
- research_md.extract_chair_directions(path) returns a compact dict
with status (missing/empty/partial/complete), filled_count,
empty_count, and a reduced list of threshold_claims + issues each
with {id, number, title, direction}. Designed to be directly usable
as direction_doc by the writer.
- New MCP tool: drafting.get_chair_directions(case_number) wraps the
helper, resolves the case research file path via config.find_case_dir,
returns formatted JSON.
- Registered in server.py as mcp__legal-ai__get_chair_directions.
legal-writer agent update:
- Adds get_chair_directions to the tools list.
- New mandatory "שלב 1ב" before any block writing: call
get_chair_directions, branch on status.
- missing → halt, report "legal-analyst לא רץ עדיין"
- empty → halt, instruct Dafna to fill positions via the UI URL
- partial → halt unless user confirms; write only filled sections
- complete → proceed
- New "שלב 1ג" constructs an internal direction_doc from the
received chair rulings before writing block י.
- Block י section expanded with 5 binding rules:
1. Open each discussion with Dafna's ruling as the thesis
2. Frame the reasoning in her style (use get_style_guide phrases)
3. Match her tone (decisive vs nuanced)
4. Must NOT contradict her position — if she disagreed with your
own inclination, her position rules
5. Use legal_questions from the analysis file as the analytical
structure (principle question first, concrete application second)
- New bullet section for block יא: summarize each chair ruling
briefly, state final outcome, close with the signed date formula.
Verified all four status paths (missing/empty/partial/complete) via
local test. Now Dafna's workflow is fully end-to-end: she reads the
analyst report in the UI, fills "עמדת ועדת הערר" in each card, hits
blur to auto-save, then triggers legal-writer — which picks up her
positions as direction without any file shuffle.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Add delete_document_chunks for reprocessing, save extracted text to disk
- Expand case directory structure (original/extracted/proofread/backup)
- Update classifier patterns (תגובה, הודעת עמדה)
- Fix proofreader agent paths for new directory layout
- Update HEARTBEAT to notify on every task completion
- Improve bidi_table with LRE/PDF directional embedding
- Add Paperclip project verification and auto-close setup issue
- Add auto-sync-cases.sh for Gitea synchronization
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Remove cases/new|in-progress|completed subdivision (status managed in DB)
- Rename documents/original → documents/originals (consistent plural)
- Move exports from global data/exports/ into cases/{num}/exports/
- Add documents/research/ for case law and analysis files
- Update all agents, scripts, config, web API endpoints, and DB paths
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Replace single CASES_DIR with find_case_dir() that searches across
all status directories. New cases created in cases/new/{number}/.
Config: CASES_BASE, CASES_NEW, CASES_IN_PROGRESS, CASES_COMPLETED
Docker: added -v /home/chaim/legal-ai/cases:/cases volume mount
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
New architecture: MCP provides context, Claude Code writes.
New functions:
- get_block_context(case_id, block_id) → returns full context package
(prompt, source docs, claims, direction, precedents, style guide)
WITHOUT calling Anthropic API
- save_block_content(case_id, block_id, content) → saves block to DB
New MCP tools: get_block_context, save_block_content
The old write_block (API-based) still works as fallback.
The new flow uses Claude Code's own model (Opus 4.6, 1M context)
which has no separate API billing.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Add expected_outcome field to cases (rejection/partial/full/betterment_levy)
- New lessons.py module with golden ratios, templates, and drafting guidance per outcome type
- Style analyzer now uses Opus with full decision text (no truncation), with multi-pass fallback for large corpora
- Drafting tool provides outcome-specific templates, section guidance, and ratio comments
- Improved JSON extraction with bracket-matching fallback
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Ezer Mishpati - AI legal decision drafting system with:
- MCP server (FastMCP) with document processing pipeline
- Web upload interface (FastAPI) for file upload and classification
- pgvector-based semantic search
- Hebrew legal document chunking and embedding
