Commit Graph

1251 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
a8dd8ee152 feat(export): INV-EX4 single-template source + fix edit-path justification
All checks were successful
G12 Leak-Guard / leak-guard (pull_request) Successful in 4s
Lint — undefined names / undefined-names (pull_request) Successful in 10s
מקור-תבנית-יחיד לכל מפיקי-מסמכי-ההחלטה: כולם מחילים סגנונות דרך
skills/docx/decision_template.docx בלבד; אסור hand-setting של פונט/גודל.

- docs/spec/06-export.md — INV-EX4 חדש (מקור-תבנית-יחיד, →G2)
- docx_reviser: מסלול-העריכה (revise_draft/apply_user_edit) הכניס פסקאות
  עם jc=right קשיח + David/sz ידני → איבד יישור דו-צדדי של התבנית.
  עכשיו מחיל pStyle מן-הטמפלט (Normal/Heading 2/Quote) + jc=both קנוני,
  בלי rFonts/sz ידני (הגופן/גודל מגיעים מהסגנון).
- שומר-CI test_docx_template_single_source — נכשל על בניית rFonts/sz
  במפיקים מחוץ לטמפלט (חריג מסומן # INV-EX4-ok ל-_mark_run_rtl,
  שמחזק את גופן-התבנית David כעקיפת באג-RTL של Word).
- אומת: build_party_claims_summary_docx (סיכום-מנהלים, WS3) + export_decision
  (סופי/טיוטת-ביניים) כבר תבניתיים ותואמי-INV-EX4.
- ארכוב scripts/exec_summary_1043.py (one-off; הוחלף ב-build_party_claims_summary_docx).
- עדכון 2 טסטים שאימתו את ההתנהגות הישנה (rFonts על run מוכנס).

Invariants: מקיים INV-EX4 (חדש), INV-G2 (מקור-יחיד, אין מסלול-סגנון מקביל),
INV-EX1 (DOCX נגזר). נוגע ב-docx_reviser/docx_exporter/analysis_docx_exporter.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-30 17:07:21 +00:00
73d2f15915 Merge pull request 'fix(calibration): drop block-yod + per-cell guard + incremental write (#208)' (#365) from worktree-agent-aeea23e1387d8d3cb into main
All checks were successful
Build & Deploy / build-and-deploy (push) Successful in 9s
G12 Leak-Guard / leak-guard (push) Successful in 4s
Lint — undefined names / undefined-names (push) Successful in 11s
2026-06-30 15:50:37 +00:00
70a06c3745 fix(calibration): drop block-yod + per-cell guard + incremental write (#208)
All checks were successful
G12 Leak-Guard / leak-guard (pull_request) Successful in 5s
Lint — undefined names / undefined-names (pull_request) Successful in 10s
A live calibration run crashed with no error handling and lost ~2h of work:
the per-cell loop in _run() reached block-yod (discussion), block_writer.write_block
raised ValueError("לא ניתן לכתוב בלוק דיון ללא כיוון מאושר…") because the discussion
block needs an approved direction calibration cases don't have, and since the report
was only written at the very end of main(), every completed generation was lost.

Three robustness fixes (no metric/scoring change — G2):

1. Drop block-yod from default CALIBRATABLE_BLOCKS — out of WS5 interim-draft scope
   AND structurally non-calibratable standalone (needs brainstorm→approve_direction).
   Kept in new VALID_BLOCKS so a user can still force it via --blocks block-yod.
2. Per-cell try/except in _run(): any single (case, block, effort) cell failure is
   logged as a warning (case/block/effort/error) and skipped, never fatal —
   defense-in-depth for a forced block-yod and for transient rate-limits mid-run.
3. Incremental persistence: _write_report flushes after each completed block (ts
   threaded into _run), so a crash later in the grid never loses finished blocks.
   JSON/MD shape unchanged — partial results omit not-yet-done blocks from by_block.

--self-test: ALL PASS (14/14). block-yod gone from --dry-run defaults.

Invariants — נוגע / מקיים:
- G8 (eval-harness robustness) — partial results persist; a single-cell failure is
  non-fatal; the harness survives block-yod's missing-direction raise and rate-limits.
- G2 (מקור-מדידה יחיד) — no metric-path change; _score_cell / block_distance_to_final
  / recommend_effort / aggregate_cell untouched.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-30 15:49:15 +00:00
c6d20654a9 Merge pull request 'chore(web-ui): regen api types — party-claims-summary endpoints (#202)' (#364) from worktree-agent-ae0bc7fc1516f1f34 into main
All checks were successful
Build & Deploy / build-and-deploy (push) Successful in 43s
G12 Leak-Guard / leak-guard (push) Successful in 4s
Lint — undefined names / undefined-names (push) Successful in 10s
2026-06-30 12:52:26 +00:00
c84417369d chore(web-ui): regen api types — party-claims-summary endpoints (#202)
All checks were successful
G12 Leak-Guard / leak-guard (pull_request) Successful in 3s
Lint — undefined names / undefined-names (pull_request) Successful in 10s
Regenerate src/lib/api/types.ts from the live production OpenAPI schema
after PR #358 (#202) added the read-only summarize_party_claims endpoints:

- GET /api/cases/{case_number}/research/party-claims-summary (read)
- GET /api/cases/{case_number}/research/party-claims-summary/download
- GET /api/cases/{case_number}/research/party-claims-summary/export-docx

The regen also picks up other endpoints that had drifted out of sync
(citation-verification, agents/reset, digest-radar, plans/fetch,
style-distance-history, scripts/{name}/run, canonical-halachot instances),
bringing the single generated client back in line with production.

Invariants: X6 (UI<->API contract kept in sync via the generated client),
G2 (single auto-generated client, no hand-edited parallel types).

tsc --noEmit passes clean.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-30 12:51:16 +00:00
d9783b1c14 Merge pull request 'feat(ui): WS6 — אקורדיון-צד בטיעונים, compose רוחב-מלא, status-hero בסקירה (#206)' (#363) from worktree-agent-a31f83020f84e89bf into main
All checks were successful
Build & Deploy / build-and-deploy (push) Successful in 44s
G12 Leak-Guard / leak-guard (push) Successful in 4s
Lint — undefined names / undefined-names (push) Successful in 11s
2026-06-30 12:24:01 +00:00
c68f3e004e Merge pull request 'docs(spec): WS7 — יישור 01/02/03/04/06 + gap-audit; ווידוא סגירת 7 דליפות עיצוב-מחדש (#207)' (#359) from worktree-agent-a3dd49d429baa5308 into main
All checks were successful
Build & Deploy / build-and-deploy (push) Successful in 8s
G12 Leak-Guard / leak-guard (push) Successful in 4s
Lint — undefined names / undefined-names (push) Successful in 10s
2026-06-30 12:22:38 +00:00
f1e9103723 feat(ui): WS6 — party accordion, full-width compose, status-hero overview (#206)
All checks were successful
G12 Leak-Guard / leak-guard (pull_request) Successful in 4s
Lint — undefined names / undefined-names (pull_request) Successful in 9s
שלושת שינויי-ה-UI של WS6 לפי המוקאפים המאושרים (25b/03b/18b, X17):

1. טאב "טיעונים" (legal-arguments-panel) — אקורדיון ברמת-הצד, סגור
   כברירת-מחדל (type="multiple" ללא defaultValue). כל trigger מציג
   שם-צד + תת-כותרת + באדג'-מונה. בתוך כל צד נשמר הקיבוץ-לפי-קדימות
   והאקורדיון הפנימי ברמת-הטיעון.

2. טאב "עמדות וטענות" (compose) — רוחב-דף מלא: בוטל ה-grid 1fr/320px,
   ראיל "מסמכי התיק" הוסר (DocumentsPanel בסקירה הוא הבעלים היחיד)
   ועבר לפס-מסמכים מתקפל למעלה (סגור כברירת-מחדל). כרטיסי-הסוגיות
   2-up. פסיקה-מצורפת ושערי-הייצוא/העלאה שומרו (relocate, לא remove).
   מפת-StatusChip המקבילה הוסרה → StatusBadge המשותף (G2).

3. סטטוס רק בסקירה (overview) — StatusHero חדש (stepper אופקי + chip
   שלב-נוכחי + שינוי-סטטוס ידני + meta-strip), הבעלים היחיד של
   הסטטוס. WorkflowTimeline/StatusChanger/AgentStatusWidget ירדו משאר
   הטאבים; הטאבים האחרים רוחב-מלא. StatusBadge read-only נשאר ב-H1.

Invariants: INV-IA1 (בעלים-יחיד לסטטוס=hero), INV-IA3/G10 (כל שער-אנוש
נשמר במקום אחד — שינוי-סטטוס בסקירה, ייצוא/העלאה ב-compose),
INV-IA4 (compose=מרחב-עבודה ממוקד-משימה רוחב-מלא), INV-IA6 (מפת-סטטוסים
progressive-disclosure), INV-UI7/UI8, G2 (StatusBadge משותף, אין
מפת-סטטוס מקבילה).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-30 12:22:07 +00:00
6f60dc7a14 Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into rebase-359
All checks were successful
G12 Leak-Guard / leak-guard (pull_request) Successful in 4s
Lint — undefined names / undefined-names (pull_request) Successful in 10s
# Conflicts:
#	docs/spec/04-analysis-writing.md
2026-06-30 12:20:57 +00:00
4feac756ba Merge pull request 'feat(analysis): דגל "לא-נותח" + ניתוח-מחדש מאחד + בדיקת-השפעה (#201)' (#361) from worktree-agent-abe485b6eb373903f into main
Some checks failed
Build & Deploy / build-and-deploy (push) Successful in 1m34s
G12 Leak-Guard / leak-guard (push) Successful in 4s
Lint — undefined names / undefined-names (push) Has been cancelled
2026-06-30 12:20:39 +00:00
7655acddc3 Merge pull request 'fix(ceo): סריקת הערות-יו"ר תלויות company-wide עם שיוך-לתיק חובה (#164)' (#362) from worktree-ceo-pending-comment-scan into main
Some checks failed
Build & Deploy / build-and-deploy (push) Has been cancelled
G12 Leak-Guard / leak-guard (push) Has been cancelled
Lint — undefined names / undefined-names (push) Has been cancelled
2026-06-30 12:19:43 +00:00
dfb2ffe7ce feat(analysis): דגל "לא-נותח" + ניתוח-מחדש מאחד + בדיקת-השפעה (#201)
All checks were successful
G12 Leak-Guard / leak-guard (pull_request) Successful in 5s
Lint — undefined names / undefined-names (pull_request) Successful in 11s
WS2b של עיצוב-מחדש זרימת-העבודה. מאפשר ניתוח כתב-הערר לבד ואז איחוד
מסמך-עיקרי שנוסף מאוחר, בלי force-delete גורף, עם diff ליו"ר.

- SCHEMA_V49: documents.claims_extracted_at + claims_extraction_status
  (אירוע-חילוץ per-מסמך, לא נגזר מ-doc_type), + אינדקס חלקי
  idx_documents_claims_pending. idempotent (ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS).
  V48 שמור ל-#357.
- claims_extractor חותם את המסמך אחרי שמירת/אי-מציאת טענות.
- db.primary_docs_not_analyzed (is_primary V47 + claims_extracted_at IS NULL)
  + mark_document_claims_extracted; _row_to_doc חושף claims_analyzed.
- reanalyze_claims (כלי-MCP): snapshot→חילוץ-מאחד רק למסמכים חדשים/לא-נותחו
  (store_claims מחליף per-source ⇒ טענות אחרות נשמרות)→aggregate force=True
  (מסלול קנוני, מוחק רק legal_arguments)→_impact_diff before↔after ליו"ר.
- workflow_status חושף primary_docs_not_analyzed + next-step.
- ספ: 02-data-model §2ג (דגל לא-נותח), 04-analysis-writing §1.3.
- 5 בדיקות-יחידה ל-_impact_diff/_snapshot (פונקציות טהורות).

Invariants:
- G1 (נרמול-במקור): claims_extracted_at נחתם בנקודת-החילוץ, claims_analyzed
  נגזר ממנו — לא תיקון-בקריאה.
- G2 (מסלול קנוני יחיד / merge-not-fork): reanalyze מרחיב את מסלול
  claims_extractor+argument_aggregator הקיים, לא forks; האיחוד דרך
  store_claims per-source; aggregate force=True מוחק רק נגזר (legal_arguments).
- INV-DM (מודל-נתונים): דגל-אירוע per-מסמך, אינדקס חלקי, מקור-אמת יחיד.
- G10 (שער-אנושי): בדיקת-ההשפעה מוצגת ליו"ר, לא מוחלת אוטומטית.
- INV-TOOL idempotency: SCHEMA_V49 idempotent; ניתוח-מחדש חוזר על מסמך
  כבר-נותח הוא refresh נקי (store_methods replace per-source).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-30 12:19:28 +00:00
26451f7c9d fix(ceo): company-wide pending-comment scan with mandatory case binding
All checks were successful
G12 Leak-Guard / leak-guard (pull_request) Successful in 3s
Lint — undefined names / undefined-names (pull_request) Successful in 10s
Root cause (proven 2026-06-30, legal-ai #164): the comment-sweep wakes the CEO
via ctx.agents.invoke, which does NOT populate $PAPERCLIP_WAKE_REASON or
payload.issueId. The run transcript showed "generic heartbeat with no scoped
wake" — the CEO's `user_commented` branch never fired, it ran a generic
heartbeat that scans only CEO-assigned issues, and chair comments on
chaim/sub-agent-owned issues (e.g. CMPA-116) were invisible → no-op. Two real
6-day-stale chair requests sat undelivered.

Fix: on any wake without a scoped reason, the CEO must DISCOVER pending chair
comments itself. Adds "סריקת הערות-יו"ר תלויות (company-wide)":
- enumerate all active company issues (/api/companies/{id}/issues)
- pending = newest user comment newer than newest agent comment (ignore
  system); order-independent sort_by(createdAt) since the API is newest-first
- MANDATORY case binding from the STRUCTURED project.name ("ערר <case> — …"),
  never from the title (CMPA-116 has none) nor the comment content (which may
  name a different case, e.g. "ניסיתי ב-CMPA-89"). No confident case → do NOT
  act; escalate to chair.
- handle each pending comment scoped to its own $ISSUE_ID/$CASE_NUMBER

Verified end-to-end against live data: 13 active issues → exactly 2 pending
(CMPA-116, CMPA-89), both resolved to case 8125-09-24 via project.name, zero
false positives. Step 0 + Step A wired to run the scan on blind wakes.

Refs #164. Pairs with the plugin sweep (delivery) — this is discovery+action.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-30 12:19:05 +00:00
99574f0eba Merge pull request 'fix(export): תיקוני-תבנית DOCX — חתימות לסוף, א–ד ללא נתונים, "החלטה"=כותרת (#205)' (#355) from worktree-agent-a4e6a6d273c4c3379 into main
Some checks failed
G12 Leak-Guard / leak-guard (push) Has been cancelled
Lint — undefined names / undefined-names (push) Has been cancelled
Build & Deploy / build-and-deploy (push) Has been cancelled
2026-06-30 12:18:41 +00:00
085de937da Merge pull request 'feat(analysis): סיכום-מנהלים מזוקק של טענות הצדדים — מסמך הכנה לדיון (#202, WS3)' (#358) from worktree-agent-abc25c98bc1092fa3 into main
Some checks failed
G12 Leak-Guard / leak-guard (push) Has been cancelled
Build & Deploy / build-and-deploy (push) Has been cancelled
Lint — undefined names / undefined-names (push) Has been cancelled
2026-06-30 12:18:09 +00:00
9e6a441076 Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into rebase-358
All checks were successful
G12 Leak-Guard / leak-guard (pull_request) Successful in 3s
Lint — undefined names / undefined-names (pull_request) Successful in 10s
# Conflicts:
#	docs/spec/04-analysis-writing.md
2026-06-30 12:16:41 +00:00
eb0653fb80 Merge pull request 'feat(calibration): כיול-אמפירי model×effort מול הסופיים (#208)' (#360) from worktree-agent-a5a22be0318670871 into main
All checks were successful
Build & Deploy / build-and-deploy (push) Successful in 1m27s
G12 Leak-Guard / leak-guard (push) Successful in 5s
Lint — undefined names / undefined-names (push) Successful in 10s
2026-06-30 12:15:46 +00:00
f935f166a9 feat(calibration): כיול-אמפירי model×effort מול הסופיים (#208)
All checks were successful
G12 Leak-Guard / leak-guard (pull_request) Successful in 3s
Lint — undefined names / undefined-names (pull_request) Successful in 10s
A/B harness שמכייל את ה-effort הנעוץ per-בלוק (#204) מול הסופיים של דפנה:
מייצר מחדש כל בלוק דרך מסלול-הייצור (write_block(effort_override=…) →
claude_session.query → claude -p, Opus 4.8, מקומי-בלבד) ומודד מול הסקשן
המתאים בסופי דרך style_distance.block_distance_to_final (change_percent,
anti_pattern_total, golden-ratio deviation, composite distance). ממליץ
per-בלוק על ה-effort הקרוב-ביותר לסופי.

- scripts/calibrate_effort.py — ההארנס (מודל eval_retrieval.py): --self-test
  (offline, מוכיח מדידה+המלצה, אפס DB/CLI) · --dry-run · --efforts/--blocks/
  --case/--repeats. דוח data/eval/effort-calibration-<ts>.{json,md} עם
  גודל-מדגם בולט — עדות-כיוון, לא רגרסיה (מעט סופיים-עלויים).
- style_distance.py — block_distance_to_final + split_final_by_section
  (מקור-מדידה יחיד, G2; reuse compute_diff_stats/count_anti_patterns/chunker).
- block_writer.py — write_block(effort_override=) להזרקת effort per-קריאה
  בלי לדרוס את ברירות-המחדל הנעוצות; רושם את ה-effort האפקטיבי.
- scripts/SCRIPTS.md — ערך חדש.

Invariants: G8 (eval-harness — מדידה אמפירית, לא הנחה) · G2 (reuse של
style_distance/learning_loop — אין מסלול-מדד מקביל) · claude_session
local-only (reference_claude_generation_path) · INV-LRN4/5 (השוואה מול
הסופי, מדידת-סגנון; אין מהות-תיק נגררת). אומת: --self-test 14/14 PASS.
הריצה החיה host-only (claude CLI) — לא ניתנת-להרצה ב-worktree/קונטיינר.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-30 12:13:43 +00:00
33b36e38ee Merge pull request 'feat(analysis): analyze_protocol — ניתוח פרוטוקול-דיון השוואתי (WS4 #203)' (#357) from worktree-agent-aefd5594d532d9f06 into main
All checks were successful
Build & Deploy / build-and-deploy (push) Successful in 1m32s
G12 Leak-Guard / leak-guard (push) Successful in 4s
Lint — undefined names / undefined-names (push) Successful in 10s
2026-06-30 12:12:05 +00:00
8d704e6e40 Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into rebase-357
All checks were successful
G12 Leak-Guard / leak-guard (pull_request) Successful in 4s
Lint — undefined names / undefined-names (pull_request) Successful in 10s
# Conflicts:
#	mcp-server/src/legal_mcp/services/db.py
2026-06-30 12:09:49 +00:00
faee621f0b Merge pull request 'feat(drafting): טיוטת-ביניים דטרמיניסטית — Opus 4.8 + effort per-בלוק (#204)' (#356) from worktree-agent-a0d2502e8308bc27c into main
All checks were successful
Build & Deploy / build-and-deploy (push) Successful in 1m27s
G12 Leak-Guard / leak-guard (push) Successful in 4s
Lint — undefined names / undefined-names (push) Successful in 10s
2026-06-30 12:03:42 +00:00
8ece726b8d Merge pull request 'feat(documents): מסמך-עיקרי — is_primary נגזר + רשימה קנונית (#200)' (#354) from worktree-agent-a59ef17c17ecd1d31 into main
Some checks failed
Build & Deploy / build-and-deploy (push) Has been cancelled
G12 Leak-Guard / leak-guard (push) Has been cancelled
Lint — undefined names / undefined-names (push) Has been cancelled
2026-06-30 12:03:01 +00:00
aa2548ff5d feat(analysis): סיכום-מנהלים מזוקק של טענות הצדדים — מסמך הכנה לדיון (#202, WS3)
All checks were successful
G12 Leak-Guard / leak-guard (pull_request) Successful in 4s
Lint — undefined names / undefined-names (pull_request) Successful in 10s
מסמך פרוזה נפרד מטיוטת-הביניים (החלטת-יו"ר): תמצית מוקפדת של טענות+תשובות
להכנת היו"ר לדיון. נגזר מ-legal_arguments/claims הקיימים — אותו מקור-אמת,
ללא חילוץ-מחדש (G2). מתוחם לטענות-התיק בלבד (INV-AH).

- כלי-MCP חדש summarize_party_claims (drafting.py + server.py); ייצור עובר
  claude_session נעוץ Opus 4.8 + effort=high (זיקוק/סינתזה); local-only.
- שירות party_claims_summary.py: בחירת-מקור arguments→claims, פרומפט מעוגן-מקור,
  שמירה ל-data/cases/{n}/documents/research/ (git + S3).
- ייצוא DOCX בסגנון-תבנית דפנה (build_party_claims_summary_docx) + endpoints
  read/download/export-docx ב-web/app.py (מגישים בלבד — אין claude CLI בקונטיינר).
- _next_version הוכלל ל-prefix-scoped (תאימות-לאחור) למניעת התנגשות-גרסאות.
- ספ 04-analysis-writing.md §1.3 + 8 בדיקות אופליין (מקור/נעיצת-מודל/markdown→docx).

Invariants: G2 (מקור-אמת יחיד, בלי מסלול מקביל) · X9 TOOL1/TOOL4 (envelope +
extract↔serve) · INV-AH (עיגון-מקור, abstention על טענה לא-ברורה) ·
claude_session local-only · G9 (provenance — נשמר durably + git/S3).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-30 11:22:20 +00:00
9ef0547997 docs(spec): WS7 — reconcile 01/02/03/04/06 + gap-audit; verify 7 workflow-redesign leaks closed (#207)
All checks were successful
G12 Leak-Guard / leak-guard (pull_request) Successful in 3s
Lint — undefined names / undefined-names (pull_request) Successful in 10s
WS7 of the workflow-redesign initiative required closing 7 known leaks along
the way. Cross-code audit verified ALL 7 were already closed in prior cycles
(FU-1/4/5/6/7 + IA waves); the spec still carried stale "known violation" text.
This PR aligns the spec to actual code state and verifies each closure with a
test. No new code path created — this is a spec-alignment audit, not a re-solve.

7 leaks → status (all closed/gated, each with a test):
1. cross-corpus halachot (#56, GAP-10/FU-4) — cl.source_kind in halacha_filters
   (db.py:7516,7519); test_precedent_corpus_isolation.py
2. invisible halacha backlog (GAP-14/FU-5) — health halacha_backlog
   (app.py:2352-2364) + extraction_status/halachot_pending
3. no eval harness (GAP-11/FU-5, G8) — scripts/eval_retrieval.py
   (P/R/MRR/nDCG vs gold-set+baseline); --self-test ALL PASS
4. export gate not hard-block (GAP-15/FU-6, INV-EX3) — export_docx checks
   qa_run_exists + get_critical_qa_failures before exporter (drafting.py:462-494);
   test_export_qa_gate.py
5. metadata on internal path (GAP-02/FU-1, INV-ING3) — unified ingest.ingest_document
   queues metadata+halacha together (ingest.py:233-234); test_unified_ingest.py
6. DOCX creep to source-of-truth (GAP-17/FU-7, INV-EX1) — active_draft_path is
   revision-anchor only; drift caught by cases.blocks_stale flag (V22)
7. UI cache-invalidation (GAP-33/FU-10) — qc.invalidateQueries on mutations

Also added forward-pointer notes for the workflow-redesign additions owned by
sibling tasks (02 documents is_primary/doc_category → #200; 04 re-analysis /
summarize_party_claims / analyze_protocol → #200/#202/#203), kept additive to
avoid line conflicts. block-schema.md interim/template edits deferred to #204/#205.

Invariants: maintains G2 (single source of truth, no parallel path — all leak
closures extend the canonical path), G8 (eval harness now exists), G10 (human
gates visible: halacha backlog + hard export gate), INV-ING3 (unified metadata
queue), INV-EX1 (DOCX is derived; blocks_stale drift flag), INV-RET1/G5 (#56
cross-corpus halacha isolation).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-30 11:22:11 +00:00
24e3e2fe80 feat(analysis): analyze_protocol — comparative hearing-protocol analysis (WS4 #203)
All checks were successful
G12 Leak-Guard / leak-guard (pull_request) Successful in 4s
Lint — undefined names / undefined-names (pull_request) Successful in 10s
מנתח פרוטוקול-דיון מול כתבי-הטענות: אילו טענות ירדו/חוזקו/עלו-חדשות + חידוד
שאלות משפטיות, ומחלץ נתוני כותרת (א–ד). התוצאה נכנסת לידע-התיק.

- protocol_analyzer.py — ניתוח השוואתי דרך claude_session (Opus 4.8, effort=high,
  מקומי בלבד); שער anti-hallucination (quote-or-retract) ב-_normalize_change;
  חילוץ א–ד + הזנת hearing_date חזרה ל-cases (לא דורס קלט-יו"ר).
- claims_extractor: protocol → claim_type='protocol'; extract_claims קולט protocol.
- block_writer._build_claims_context מחריג claim_type='protocol' מבלוק ז (INV-WR4).
- db: טבלת protocol_analysis (V47, idempotent per-doc) + replace/list helpers.
- tools/drafting + server: analyze_protocol + get_protocol_analysis (extract/get).
- ספ 04-analysis-writing §1.3 + 15 בדיקות.

Invariants: G1 (נרמול-במקור: hearing_date לעמודה הקנונית), G2 (ידע-תיק נגזר
ממקור-האמת protocol+legal_arguments, לא מסלול מקביל), INV-TOOL3 (idempotent
per document_id), INV-TOOL4 (extract/get symmetry), INV-AH (quote-or-retract),
INV-WR4 (בלוק ז = טענות-כתב מקוריות בלבד), claude_session local-only, G12 (נקי
מ-Paperclip — leak-guard עובר).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-30 11:21:13 +00:00
aad2de9205 feat(drafting): טיוטת-ביניים דטרמיניסטית — נעיצת Opus 4.8 + effort per-בלוק (#204)
All checks were successful
G12 Leak-Guard / leak-guard (pull_request) Successful in 4s
Lint — undefined names / undefined-names (pull_request) Successful in 10s
מנגנון-הייצור (claude_session→claude -p) לא העביר model/effort: BLOCK_CONFIG
הגדיר temp+model per-בלוק שהיו מטא-דאטה-מת (block_writer.py:447 העביר רק
prompt/timeout/tools). הייצור רץ על מודל ברירת-המחדל של ה-CLI עם פרומפטים-חופשיים
→ מקור אי-העקביות בטיוטת-הביניים.

תיקון (עקביות-מבנית, WS5):
- נעיצת model="claude-opus-4-8" (GENERATION_MODEL) לכל בלוקי-ה-AI + effort per-בלוק
  שמועבר בפועל דרך claude_session.query → `claude -p --model --effort`.
  מפת-effort: ה=medium · ו=medium · ז=high · ח=medium · ט=high · יא=high · י=xhigh.
- ניסוח-פתיחה קבוע לבלוק-ה (תמיד "לפנינו ערר…", סוף ל-OR "עניינה של החלטה זו").
- מבנה-פנימי קבוע לבלוק-ה; סדר-בלוקים בייצוא כבר קבוע (_INTERIM_BLOCK_ORDER).
- הסרת שדות temp/model המתים מ-BLOCK_CONFIG; "temp" deprecated (Opus 4.7/4.8 דוחים
  temperature→400). decision_blocks.temperature נשמר=0 לתאימות-עמודה בלבד.
- timeout נגזר מ-effort (לא מפיצול sonnet/opus שכבר לא קיים).
- עדכון endpoint reference /api/settings/mcp/blocks + blocks-tab + McpBlock לחשוף effort.
- ספ: docs/block-schema.md §3 (effort מחליף temperature), docs/spec/06-export.md
  (דטרמיניזם-מבני של טיוטת-הביניים).

G2 (מקור-אמת יחיד) — אין מסלול-ייצור מקביל: write_interim_draft מתזמר את אותו
write_and_store_block→write_block של ההחלטה המלאה.
claude_session-local-only — הייצור נשאר דרך גשר-ה-CLI, לא SDK/קונטיינר.
INV-EX1 — סדר-ייצוא דטרמיניסטי נשמר; G11 — עקרונות-הכתיבה ל-12 הבלוקים נשמרים.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-30 11:18:56 +00:00
23e088d25e fix(export): clear template tables in _clear_body — חתימות לסוף, א–ד ללא נתונים (#205)
All checks were successful
G12 Leak-Guard / leak-guard (pull_request) Successful in 4s
Lint — undefined names / undefined-names (pull_request) Successful in 10s
תיקוני-תבנית DOCX (WS5 ת1–ת3): הטמפלט decision_template.docx מכיל 3 טבלאות-
דוגמה (כותרת מוסדית / הרכב / חתימות). _clear_body הסיר רק <w:p> והשאיר את
הטבלאות. כתוצאה:

- ת3 (שורש): טבלת-החתימות שרדה במיקום-הטמפלט (למעלה, צמוד לטבלת-הכותרת/בלוק-ד),
  וכל תוכן-ההחלטה נדחף אחריה. החתימות הופיעו בראש המסמך במקום בסוף.
- ת1: טבלאות הכותרת/הרכב הזריקו נתוני בלוק-א–ד שלא חולצו מהפרוטוקול.

התיקון בשכבת-הרינדור (G1 — לתקן במקור, לא לשכפל סימפטום): _clear_body מסיר
כעת את כל גוף-המסמך (פסקאות, טבלאות, ו-bookmarks יתומים) ומשאיר רק sectPr.
ההחלטה משוחזרת כולה מ-decision_blocks (INV-EX1) — החתימות מגיעות מ-block-yod-bet
שמרונדר אחרון בסדר-הבלוקים, ולכן טבלאות-הדוגמה הן פיגום מיושן שצריך להימחק.

ת2 כבר תקין: block-dalet מרנדר רק את הכותרת "החלטה" (Heading 1, מתעלם מתוכן-
ה-DB) — הוסף test מפורש לנעילה.

תוקן גם ב-analysis_docx_exporter._clear_body (אותו באג, סימטריה G2).

Tests: 4 regression חדשים + 27 docx-tests עוברים.

Invariants: INV-EX1 (DOCX נתון-נגזר מ-decision_blocks, ללא דליפת תוכן-טמפלט) ·
G1 (תיקון-במקור) · G2 (סימטריה בין שני ה-exporters) · G11/block-schema
(block-ד = כותרת בלבד, block-יב = חתימות בסוף).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-30 11:16:39 +00:00
7a7249af38 feat(documents): מסמך-עיקרי — is_primary נגזר + רשימה קנונית (#200)
All checks were successful
G12 Leak-Guard / leak-guard (pull_request) Successful in 4s
Lint — undefined names / undefined-names (pull_request) Successful in 10s
WS2 (#200): מבחין בין מסמך-עיקרי (מסמך-מהות שהיו"ר עוקבת אחריו לניתוח)
למשני. רשימה קנונית מאושרת-יו"ר: appeal/response/objection/protocol/
appraisal/decision; כל doc_type אחר = משני.

- db.PRIMARY_DOC_TYPES = מקור-אמת יחיד (tuple) + is_primary_doc_type().
- SCHEMA_V47: documents.is_primary BOOLEAN GENERATED ALWAYS AS
  (doc_type = ANY(PRIMARY_DOC_TYPES)) STORED — Postgres גוזר, אין מסלול-
  כתיבה מקביל, לא יכול לסטות מ-doc_type (G1/G2/INV-DM7, כמו ה-tsvectors).
  אידמפוטנטי (ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS, ביטוי קבוע) + אינדקס חלקי
  idx_documents_primary לשאילתת "עיקריים שטרם-נותחו" (#201).
- _row_to_doc גוזר גם בקריאה (רשומות טרום-מיגרציה) + מוסיף doc_category
  ∈ {primary, secondary}. נחשף דרך document_list / case_get / API.
- 02-data-model.md §2ג מתעד את השדה הנגזר.

Invariants: G1 (נרמול-במקור — נגזר, לא נכתב), G2/INV-DM7 (מקור-אמת
יחיד, אין עמודה כפולה/מסלול מקביל), INV-DM3 (דפוס GENERATED drift-free),
INV-DM6 (ללא enum-TEXT חדש — סיווג נגזר). §6 (אין בליעה שקטה).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-30 11:16:26 +00:00
61e6be4b90 Merge pull request 'docs(heartbeat): שער קריאת-הערות לפני סגירה — מונע נפילת הערות-יו"ר (#164)' (#353) from worktree-comment-recheck-gate into main
All checks were successful
Build & Deploy / build-and-deploy (push) Successful in 9s
G12 Leak-Guard / leak-guard (push) Successful in 4s
Lint — undefined names / undefined-names (push) Successful in 10s
2026-06-30 10:22:07 +00:00
24e02621df docs(heartbeat): comment-recheck gate before done — prevent dropped chair comments
All checks were successful
G12 Leak-Guard / leak-guard (pull_request) Successful in 4s
Lint — undefined names / undefined-names (pull_request) Successful in 10s
Belt-and-suspenders to the plugin sweep (plugin-legal-ai #3). Comments that
arrive mid-run aren't re-read automatically — an agent reads comments once at
run start (§2), so a chair comment that lands after that point and before the
run closes the issue is never seen. That is exactly how a chair comment on
CMP-190 (2026-06-30) was dropped.

Adds a mandatory gate to HEARTBEAT §4ב: before PATCH status=done, re-read
comments and compare to the run-start list. If a new unaddressed chair comment
exists — do not close. Either handle it (and record a comment) or, if it
widens scope, keep the issue open and hand back to the CEO (§4ג). Never mark
done while a chair comment waits unanswered.

The plugin sweep catches orphaned comments within ~2 min; this gate prevents
the drop at the source. Refs legal-ai #164.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-30 10:20:47 +00:00
0f68cb2d0b Merge pull request 'feat(ui): באדג'י synthesis/superseded + provenance ב-lessons-tab (#162)' (#352) from worktree-lessons-synthesis-badges into main
All checks were successful
Build & Deploy / build-and-deploy (push) Successful in 1m31s
G12 Leak-Guard / leak-guard (push) Successful in 5s
Lint — undefined names / undefined-names (push) Successful in 10s
2026-06-28 22:59:55 +00:00
987da57da4 feat(ui): synthesis/superseded badges + merge provenance in lessons-tab (#162)
All checks were successful
G12 Leak-Guard / leak-guard (pull_request) Successful in 4s
Lint — undefined names / undefined-names (pull_request) Successful in 10s
עוצב ואושר דרך שער-העיצוב (Claude Design 12c-training-lessons.html).
- lessons-tab: SOURCE_BADGE['synthesis']="סינתזה" (navy מלא) · REVIEW_BADGE['superseded']="מוזג"
  (אפור-מעומעם, לא נדחה); שורות superseded מעומעמות (opacity).
- provenance: לקח-על מציג "⤷ מוזג מ-N לקחים · דחייה תשחזר אותם".
- backend: list_decision_lessons + _lesson_to_json מחזירים synthesized_from; training.ts
  DecisionLesson — 'synthesis'/'superseded' ל-unions + synthesized_from?: string[].

הבאדג'ים היו מוגנים-fallback קודם (ללא קריסה) — כעת מתויגים נכון. closes #162.

בדיקות: py_compile ✓ · leak-guard ✓ · tsc --noEmit ✓.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-28 22:59:31 +00:00
1136711ec8 Merge pull request 'docs(voice): apply corpus-56 fingerprint refresh (chair-approved, #161)' (#351) from worktree-apply-voice-fingerprint into main
All checks were successful
Build & Deploy / build-and-deploy (push) Successful in 7s
G12 Leak-Guard / leak-guard (push) Successful in 5s
Lint — undefined names / undefined-names (push) Successful in 10s
2026-06-28 22:55:33 +00:00
d83d1b248f docs(voice): apply corpus-56 fingerprint refresh (chair-approved, #161)
All checks were successful
G12 Leak-Guard / leak-guard (pull_request) Successful in 4s
Lint — undefined names / undefined-names (pull_request) Successful in 11s
The chair (Dafna/chaim) reviewed and approved the full corpus-refresh proposal
generated by scripts/regenerate_voice_fingerprint.py and committed it to the live
voice-fingerprint — satisfying the INV-LRN1 hard chair-gate (a human approved;
the script only ever proposed). +81/-15 lines: all the deletions are reword-and-
expand of existing lines (no curated insight lost), the additions are style/method
refinements grounded in the 56-decision corpus (INV-LRN5 — no case substance):

- §1.2 conditional-acceptance as an "anחנו" verb (מקובל עלינו vs נציין)
- §1.3 ruling variation "ראשית, צודק [צד]... אלא ש"
- §1.5 emphasis always annotated "(הדגשת הח\"מ)"
- §1.8 bounded appraiser-restraint (professional plane only; legal plane = no deference)
- §1.9 inverse twin "ניתן היה לסיים... אלא ש"
- §1.11 quantitative anchoring as a reframing device (cross-type)
- §1.12 measured block ratios (background 17 / claims 27 / discussion 42 / summary 14)
- §1.13 faithful rendering of a party's internal reasoning
- §2.2 two-sided pendulum for the restraint paragraph + expanded party-verb catalog
- §4.8 new template "ניתן היה לסיים — אלא ש"
- §5.x agent instructions updated to reference the new patterns

Invariants: INV-LRN1 (chair approved before commit — the gate held), INV-LRN5
(style/method only, no substance).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-28 22:55:07 +00:00
0398274564 Merge pull request 'feat(learning): העלאת תקרת-לקחים-לכותב 15 → 60 — סוגר את #157' (#350) from worktree-writer-lessons-limit into main
All checks were successful
Build & Deploy / build-and-deploy (push) Successful in 1m26s
G12 Leak-Guard / leak-guard (push) Successful in 5s
Lint — undefined names / undefined-names (push) Successful in 10s
2026-06-28 22:51:19 +00:00
a6fb632221 feat(learning): raise writer lessons cap 15 → 60 (config.WRITER_LESSONS_LIMIT) — closes #157
All checks were successful
G12 Leak-Guard / leak-guard (pull_request) Successful in 4s
Lint — undefined names / undefined-names (pull_request) Successful in 11s
עכשיו שהלקחים מנוכי-כפילות (סינתזה #158) ומאושרי-יו"ר, התקרה 15 חתכה בשקט הנחיות-סגנון
מובחנות ו-vetted (רישוי/סגנון 29>15). מעלים ל-60 (env-tunable WRITER_LESSONS_LIMIT) —
מכסה כל shard נוכחי עם מרווח; הסינתזה שומרת על אי-רדודנטיות בצמיחה. ה-WARN על חיתוך נשאר
רשת-הביטחון (חוקה §6) ומפנה לסינתזה/העלאת-התקרה. block_writer צורך דרך config.

Invariants: INV-LRN1/G10 (עדיין רק approved זורם; superseded מוחרג), G2. closes #157 בפועל.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-28 22:50:55 +00:00
5e7097399f Merge pull request 'tune(learning): סף-אשכול סינתזת-לקחים 0.82 → 0.68 (#158)' (#349) from worktree-synth-threshold-068 into main
All checks were successful
Build & Deploy / build-and-deploy (push) Successful in 1m30s
G12 Leak-Guard / leak-guard (push) Successful in 6s
Lint — undefined names / undefined-names (push) Successful in 11s
2026-06-28 22:45:11 +00:00
6c3c6a16c2 tune(learning): lesson-synthesis cluster threshold 0.82 → 0.68 (#158)
All checks were successful
G12 Leak-Guard / leak-guard (pull_request) Successful in 4s
Lint — undefined names / undefined-names (pull_request) Successful in 10s
כיול אמפירי (dry-run על 81 לקחים): הלקחים מגוונים (חציון-דמיון ~0.48, מקס' ~0.72), כך
ש-0.82 מיזג 0 אשכולות. 0.68 תופס 5 קונסולידציות אמיתיות (רישוי+השבחה+מבנה), כולן עברו את
שער-ה-drift 0.80 (0.848–0.916) → נאמנות נשמרת. שער-ה-drift נשאר רשת-הביטחון מתחת לסף.

Invariants: INV-LRN8 (כיול-סף בלבד; המנגנון/השערים ללא שינוי). depends-on #158.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-28 22:44:55 +00:00
7a7db6933d Merge pull request 'feat(learning): voice-fingerprint corpus-refresh proposal generator (#161, prose half)' (#348) from worktree-voice-fingerprint-refresh into main
All checks were successful
Build & Deploy / build-and-deploy (push) Successful in 1m27s
G12 Leak-Guard / leak-guard (push) Successful in 4s
Lint — undefined names / undefined-names (push) Successful in 10s
2026-06-28 22:26:39 +00:00
d3d379af65 Merge pull request 'feat(learning): סינתזת-לקחים — מיזוג לקחים חופפים ללקח-על עשיר (#158 / INV-LRN8)' (#347) from worktree-lesson-synthesis into main
Some checks failed
Build & Deploy / build-and-deploy (push) Has been cancelled
G12 Leak-Guard / leak-guard (push) Has been cancelled
Lint — undefined names / undefined-names (push) Has been cancelled
2026-06-28 22:26:28 +00:00
9a19db1ec1 feat(learning): voice-fingerprint corpus-refresh proposal generator (#161, prose half)
All checks were successful
G12 Leak-Guard / leak-guard (pull_request) Successful in 4s
Lint — undefined names / undefined-names (pull_request) Successful in 11s
The voice-fingerprint (docs/daphna-voice-fingerprint.md) is the PRIMARY abstract
style channel the writer consumes (07-learning §0.2 channel A), but it was
hand-authored and never regenerated from the growing corpus — the "voice" the
writer adapts stayed frozen while finals accumulated. PR #345 unfroze the
structural half (corpus-measured ratios → writer); this is the prose half.

scripts/regenerate_voice_fingerprint.py reads the corpus (style_corpus stats +
a bounded block-level style_exemplars sample + measured section ratios) and asks
Opus (local) to PROPOSE refinements/additions to the fingerprint — STYLE / METHOD
/ VOICE / LEXICON only, grounded in corpus evidence, never case substance
(INV-LRN5), preserving curated insights rather than replacing them.

CHAIR-GATED, HARD (INV-LRN1): the prose profile is voice-knowledge, not a
low-risk style rule, so it does NOT auto-flow. The script writes a PROPOSAL to
data/curator-proposals/ (the existing curator-proposal surface) and NEVER
overwrites the live fingerprint; the chair reviews and hand-commits accepted parts
— the same manual gate the fingerprint already uses. Runs on the host (claude CLI).

Reuses claude_session + measure_corpus_ratios + the curator-proposals dir (G2 —
no parallel synthesis or gate). SCRIPTS.md + spec §0.2 updated.

Invariants: INV-LRN1 (hard chair gate for voice-knowledge prose), INV-LRN5
(style-only synthesis), G2 (reuses existing synthesis inputs + proposal surface).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-28 22:26:04 +00:00
14ab7b0cae feat(learning): lesson synthesis — merge overlapping lessons into richer super-lessons (#158 / INV-LRN8)
All checks were successful
G12 Leak-Guard / leak-guard (pull_request) Successful in 4s
Lint — undefined names / undefined-names (pull_request) Successful in 10s
הפתרון-האמיתי לחיתוך-השקט limit=15 (#157): במקום ערימת לקחים גולמיים חופפים, ממזגים
לקחי-סגנון דומים ל"לקח-על" אחד עשיר ומוכלל — הסט שזורם לכותב קטֵן ומשתבח (Authorial
Style Profiling). מחקה את סינתזת-הקנוני (V41/INV-LRN6) על אותה טבלה (G2, אין מאגר-מקביל).

מנגנון (services/lesson_synthesis.py, מסלול-יחיד):
- אשכול greedy לפי cosine (LESSON_SYNTH_CLUSTER_THRESHOLD) בתוך shard practice_area+category.
- מיזוג ע"י claude_session מעוגן-מקור (INV-AH, סגנון-בלבד INV-LRN5, abstain) + שער-drift
  (cosine מול centroid ≥ LESSON_SYNTH_DRIFT_FLOOR).
- לקח-על נכתב source='synthesis' + synthesized_from; המקורות→review_status='superseded'.
- שער מדורג-הפיך (הכרעת-יו"ר): מקורות approved → לקח-על approved (זורם), veto-יו"ר משחזר
  את המקורות (db.revert_lesson_synthesis, מחובר ל-PATCH lessons).
- idempotency: lookup-cosine מול synthesis קיים לפני INSERT.

נגזרות: SCHEMA_V46 (embedding vector(1024) + synthesized_from + ivfflat); כלי-MCP
lesson_synthesize_pending; scripts/backfill_lesson_synthesis.py (--dry-run/--apply, audit CSV);
config LESSON_SYNTH_*; spec INV-LRN8; SCRIPTS.md.

get_recent_decision_lessons ללא שינוי — superseded יוצא (מסנן approved), synthesis נכנס.
UI badges (synthesis/superseded) נדחים לשער-העיצוב (מוגנים ב-fallback, ללא קריסה).

בדיקות: py_compile ✓ · leak-guard G12 ✓ · smoke-test טהור לאשכול/cosine/centroid ✓.
אימות functional מלא (dry-run מול DB+voyage+claude CLI) — בהוסט אחרי-deploy, כמו V41.

Invariants: G2 (מסלול-יחיד, אותה טבלה), INV-AH (עיגון+drift), INV-LRN1/G10 (שער מדורג-הפיך),
INV-LRN5 (סגנון-בלבד), INV-LRN8 (חדש). depends-on #157/#159.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-28 22:24:42 +00:00
c1983ea41d Merge pull request 'feat(ops): host_sync.sh — auto-sync host tree to origin/main (#160)' (#346) from worktree-host-sync into main
All checks were successful
Build & Deploy / build-and-deploy (push) Successful in 8s
G12 Leak-Guard / leak-guard (push) Successful in 4s
Lint — undefined names / undefined-names (push) Successful in 10s
2026-06-28 22:20:40 +00:00
80a5daa3e3 feat(ops): host_sync.sh — auto-sync host tree to origin/main (P-#160)
All checks were successful
G12 Leak-Guard / leak-guard (pull_request) Successful in 4s
Lint — undefined names / undefined-names (pull_request) Successful in 10s
The writer, learning panels, and legal_mcp tools run from the HOST tree
(Paperclip agents claude -p with cwd=~/legal-ai; pm2 services import from
mcp-server/src) — not the container. A merge + Coolify deploy only refreshes the
FastAPI container; host-side code stayed on the last manual `git pull`. On
2026-06-28 the host was 16 commits behind, so a day of learning-loop fixes sat
dormant until pulled by hand.

host_sync.sh (run every minute via cron, like the existing data/training pull)
fast-forwards the host tree to origin/main when it falls behind. Fast-forward
ONLY — never forces, so the perpetually-dirty .taskmaster/tasks/tasks.json is
never clobbered (clean ff leaves it; an upstream conflict logs + bails for manual
handling). Agent runs spawn fresh and pick up new code with no restart; only the
long-running pm2 services that import app code (chat_service, court_fetch_service,
reaper) are restarted, and only when their own files changed (precise, minimal
churn). Logs to data/logs/host_sync.log.

Cron entry (added on the host, flock-guarded):
  * * * * * flock -n /tmp/host_sync.lock bash ~/legal-ai/scripts/host_sync.sh

SCRIPTS.md updated.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-28 22:20:13 +00:00
9455da7567 Merge pull request 'feat(learning): feed corpus-measured ratios to the writer (P2 #7, structural half)' (#345) from worktree-corpus-ratios-writer into main
All checks were successful
Build & Deploy / build-and-deploy (push) Successful in 1m25s
G12 Leak-Guard / leak-guard (push) Successful in 4s
Lint — undefined names / undefined-names (push) Successful in 10s
2026-06-28 22:11:13 +00:00
638dbf9b9f feat(learning): feed corpus-measured section ratios to the writer (P2 #7, structural half)
All checks were successful
G12 Leak-Guard / leak-guard (pull_request) Successful in 3s
Lint — undefined names / undefined-names (pull_request) Successful in 10s
Golden ratios were measured from the corpus (style_distance.measure_corpus_ratios)
but never reached the writer — it used only the hardcoded STRUCTURE_GUIDANCE text.
So the structural target was frozen, and drafts kept deviating (e.g. discussion
block 10% vs a 40-47% target) with no corrective signal.

_structure_guidance_with_corpus(outcome, practice_area) now appends the
corpus-measured section ratios for the block's outcome to the structure guidance,
at both writer entry points (write_block + get_block_context) via one shared helper
(G2). Because measure_corpus_ratios reads style_corpus — which grows with every
enrolled final (see exemplar-growth, #343) — the writer's structural target now
reflects Dafna's ACTUAL current distribution and improves as the corpus grows.
Deterministic (no LLM); best-effort.

This is the STRUCTURAL half of the voice-profile-refresh (#7). The remaining half —
LLM-regenerating the abstract voice-fingerprint PROSE from the corpus (chair-gated)
— is a distinct larger initiative, deliberately deferred rather than rushed.

Invariants: G1 (the writer gets the live measured target, not a frozen constant),
G2 (one structure-guidance builder shared by both entry points; reuses the existing
measure_corpus_ratios — no parallel measurement), INV-LRN4 (the corpus the loop
grows now feeds the writer's structural target).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-28 22:10:39 +00:00
97f3f50d0b Merge pull request 'feat(learning): chair-feedback style corrections auto-flow to writer (P1 #6)' (#344) from worktree-chair-feedback-flow into main
All checks were successful
Build & Deploy / build-and-deploy (push) Successful in 1m28s
G12 Leak-Guard / leak-guard (push) Successful in 4s
Lint — undefined names / undefined-names (push) Successful in 10s
2026-06-28 22:07:30 +00:00
8b23542dec feat(learning): chair-feedback style corrections auto-flow to the writer (P1 #6)
All checks were successful
G12 Leak-Guard / leak-guard (pull_request) Successful in 3s
Lint — undefined names / undefined-names (pull_request) Successful in 10s
The chair-feedback chain was DEAD: 27 feedback rows captured, 0 ever became a
lesson the writer reads (no weekly-analysis job ever existed). The chair's own
corrections — the most authoritative signal of all, and exactly "learn from every
returned draft" — went nowhere.

decision_lessons can't carry them: it's FK-coupled to a style_corpus row (a signed
final), which a case-in-progress doesn't have. So chair STYLE feedback instead
rides the discussion_rules channel that already reaches the writer for all blocks —
the same path /training promote uses.

- db.append_global_rule: the locked read-modify-write append, extracted from web
  `_append_methodology_override` into one shared impl (G2). The web function is now
  a thin wrapper that seeds defaults; chair-feedback calls it directly.
- record_chair_feedback (MCP tool): a STYLE-category correction (style/wrong_tone/
  wrong_structure) with a lesson_extracted flows immediately to discussion_rules.
  The chair IS the gate — no separate approval (INV-LRN1 graduated gate). SUBSTANCE
  feedback (missing_content/factual_error/other) is case-specific → recorded only.

Invariants: INV-LRN1 (chair-authored style = highest authority, flows; substance
not auto-flowed), G2 (single append impl shared by promote + feedback), INV-LRN5
(style channel only).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-28 22:06:58 +00:00
b8eb0ee123 Merge pull request 'feat(learning): ניתוח-§A של האוצֵר רץ על mark-final — לכידת source='curator' על כל סופי (#159)' (#342) from worktree-curator-autofire into main
All checks were successful
Build & Deploy / build-and-deploy (push) Successful in 8s
G12 Leak-Guard / leak-guard (push) Successful in 4s
Lint — undefined names / undefined-names (push) Successful in 10s
2026-06-28 22:03:15 +00:00
b0a6c2fe01 Merge pull request 'feat(learning): grow style-exemplars from every final (P1 #5)' (#343) from worktree-grow-exemplars into main
All checks were successful
Build & Deploy / build-and-deploy (push) Successful in 1m28s
G12 Leak-Guard / leak-guard (push) Successful in 4s
Lint — undefined names / undefined-names (push) Successful in 10s
2026-06-28 21:58:12 +00:00