Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
7ee90dce31 feat: external precedent library with auto halacha extraction
All checks were successful
Build & Deploy / build-and-deploy (push) Successful in 1m27s
Adds a third corpus of legal authority distinct from style_corpus
(Daphna's prior decisions for voice) and case_precedents (chair-attached
quotes per case). The new corpus holds chair-uploaded court rulings and
other appeals committee decisions, with binding rules (הלכות) extracted
automatically and queued for chair approval.

Pipeline (web/app.py + services/precedent_library.py):
file → extract → chunk → Voyage embed → halacha_extractor → store +
publish progress over the existing Redis SSE channel.

Schema V7 (services/db.py): extends case_law with source_kind +
extraction status fields under a CHECK constraint pinning practice_area
to the three appeals committee domains (rishuy_uvniya, betterment_levy,
compensation_197). New precedent_chunks (vector(1024)) and halachot
tables (vector(1024) over rule_statement, IVFFlat indexes, gin on
practice_areas/subject_tags). Halachot start as pending_review; only
approved/published rows are visible to search_precedent_library.

Agents: legal-writer, legal-researcher, legal-analyst, legal-ceo,
legal-qa get search_precedent_library. legal-writer prompt explains
the three-corpus distinction and CREAC use; legal-qa now verifies that
every cited halacha resolves to an approved row in the corpus.

UI: /precedents page with four tabs — library / semantic search /
pending review (J/K nav, A/R/E shortcuts, badge count) / stats.
Reuses the existing upload-sheet progress + SSE pattern.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-03 08:38:18 +00:00
be9fa9e712 Add decision-writing methodology based on FJC, Garner, Posner sources
"בית ספר להחלטות" Phase 2 — the system now has formal analytical
methodology for building quasi-judicial decisions, separate from
Dafna's writing style (SKILL.md) and content checklists.

What was done:
- Downloaded 5 authoritative sources (~341K words): FJC Judicial
  Writing Manual (1991+2020), Garner Legal Writing in Plain English,
  Posner How Judges Think, Scalia/Garner Making Your Case
- Extracted principles from all sources into intermediate docs
- Synthesized into docs/decision-methodology.md (3,400 words,
  12 sections, 10 guiding principles)
- Integrated methodology into block-yod prompt via {methodology_guidance}
- Restructured legal-writer agent workflow to follow analytical stages
- Made "answer all claims" flexible (bundle/skip via chair_directions)
- Added methodology compliance check (#7) to legal-qa agent
- Updated all knowledge files (CLAUDE.md, SKILL.md, lessons, corpus)

Three-layer architecture:
1. Methodology (decision-methodology.md) — universal, how to think
2. Content checklists (lessons.py) — specific per appeal subtype
3. Style (SKILL.md) — Dafna's personal writing patterns

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-12 23:29:16 +00:00
ed8502d46b Update knowledge files with corpus analysis and feedback system docs
- CLAUDE.md: added corpus-analysis.md to reference table, documented chair feedback system
- block-schema.md: added content_checklist constraint to block-yod
- legal-decision-lessons.md: added lessons 12-16 from corpus analysis (planning discussion, 5 subtypes, feedback system)
- SKILL.md: added section 12 (content checklists, planning discussion patterns, chair feedback)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-12 21:25:54 +00:00
911c797eb2 Reorganize: skills/ directory + move memory to docs/
skill-legal-decision/ → skills/decision/
skill-legal-assistant/ → skills/assistant/
skill-legal-docx/ → skills/docx/
memory/*.md → docs/

Also removed: TASKS.md (use TaskMaster), classifier.py (replaced by local_classifier.py)
Updated all references in CLAUDE.md, scripts, PRDs, docs.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-04 14:27:07 +00:00