Three new voice docs based on deep reading of 1033-25 (full-acceptance) and
7 representative cases for block-zayin (claims summary):
- daphna-acceptance-architecture.md: 5 distinct templates for case acceptance
(A: internal flaw + voiding; B: remand to committee; C: corrections in
request; D: substantive 8xxx; E: appraiser remand). Fixes the wrong
reference in architecture-by-outcome that treated full-acceptance as a
variation of partial-acceptance.
- daphna-block-zayin-claims.md: rules for claims summary block — order by
procedural role, neutrality, sub-headings per party, anti-patterns
(numbered lists, evaluation words, premature conclusion).
- daphna-decision-tree.md: operational tool that unifies all 5 voice docs
into a short analytical process. Starts with the decisive question:
"what is the winning evidence?". Decision trees for architecture
selection, opening mode, citation choice, length by weight.
Updates legal-writer.md to read decision-tree first, then the 5 voice docs,
plus block-zayin.md before block ז.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
After reading all 23 1xxx decisions from style_corpus DB (in addition to
the 10 training files and 1130-25/1194-25 deep reads), synthesized two
new operational documents:
docs/daphna-precedent-network.md
- Maps each legal issue to the specific precedent Daphna cites
- 9 threshold issues (standing, השפר, סעיף 152, קנייני, פגמי פרסום,
פסילה, עבירות בנייה) with her preferred quotes for each
- 8 substantive issues (תכנון נקודתי vs כולל, חיקוק תכנית, סטייה ניכרת,
62א, חניה, תמ"א 38, תכניות ישנות, שימוש חורג)
- Lists ~30 external precedents she cites consistently + ~15 personal
precedents (her own canon — 1110/20 בעלז, 1112/22 שקופה, 1181/22 אדלר,
1130-25, etc.)
- Distinguishes precedents she cites vs. those she does NOT cite
docs/daphna-architecture-by-outcome.md
- 7 distinct block-yod architectures keyed to outcome type:
1. Pure rejection (short, 555-2000 words)
2. Rejection after complex analysis (2500-4500)
3. Threshold dismissal + merits "ועל מנת לא לצאת בחסר" (mode F)
4. Three or more distinct issues (sub-headings)
5. Partial acceptance (full funnel architecture)
6. Joined appeals
7. Remand follow-up
- Decision tree for the agent (4 questions → architecture choice)
- Internal proportions table (opening 5-10%, doctrine 15-25%, etc.)
- Costs matrix with 6 scenarios
Updated docs/daphna-voice-fingerprint.md with section 6 (additions from
23-file corpus read): 2 new opening modes (F: threshold+merits, G:
remand follow-up), nuanced sub-heading rule, self-citation of full
analytical blocks, 10 new "we" verbs, 11 traditional phrases with
sources, expanded costs matrix, transparency about petition outcomes,
warning that 1015-24 is dissent (not Daphna's voice).
Updated .claude/agents/legal-writer.md to require reading all 4 voice
docs before block-yod (the "voice quartet"), with explicit decision
tree integration.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
