feat(chunker): הוספת דפוסי טענות לפסיקת בית-המשפט (parties_claims)
All checks were successful
G12 Leak-Guard / leak-guard (pull_request) Successful in 4s
Lint — undefined names / undefined-names (pull_request) Successful in 11s

פסקי-דין של ביהמ"ש העליון/מנהלי משתמשים בנוסחאות שונות מוועדת הערר:
- "טענות הצדדים" / "טיעוני הצדדים" — סוג חדש parties_claims
- "טיעוני המערערים/ת" — מוסף ל-appellant_claims
- "טיעוני המשיבים/ה" — מוסף ל-respondent_claims

parties_claims הוסף ל-NON_REASONING_SECTIONS בhalacha_extractor
כדי שלא יוזנו לחילוץ הלכות (בדיוק כמו appellant_claims/respondent_claims).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-06-17 17:17:00 +00:00
parent 93cd0f9553
commit 9618dc895b
2 changed files with 13 additions and 8 deletions

View File

@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ EXTRACTABLE_SECTIONS = ("legal_analysis", "ruling", "conclusion")
# reasoning that merely landed under 'other' is still reached. Raises precision
# on the dominant Facts↔Reasoning confusion class (#81.6; INV-LRN2
# quality-at-source; LegalSeg / rhetorical-role labeling).
NON_REASONING_SECTIONS = ("facts", "appellant_claims", "respondent_claims", "intro")
NON_REASONING_SECTIONS = ("facts", "appellant_claims", "respondent_claims", "parties_claims", "intro")
# Two prompts — choose by source's is_binding flag.